Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 157 analyzed words
BS Summary: These American Museum Of Natural History results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 55% saturation with 255 hits . Analysis detected 1,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.2% and a BS Rank of 97% (1,213 of 37,536 keywords). This American Museum Of Natural History is worse (more manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. American Museum Of Natural History
Keyword details
Total words: 464
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.8% percentile 12.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles464 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 48.9% 48.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 55.0% 55.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 34.0% 34.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 17.0% 17.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 17.7% 17.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 55.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 48.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 34.0%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 5.2% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.0% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst