Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Amendment 5 results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 1,672 hits . Analysis detected 8,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,872 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,444 keywords). This Amendment 5 is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Amendment 5
Keyword details
Total words: 12,872
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst