Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amelia Earhart results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 414 hits. Analysis detected 1,802 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (26,086 of 37,533 keywords). This Amelia Earhart is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Amelia Earhart
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠31%Amelia Earhart (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,856
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

31% percentile
025507510030.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 14.5%14.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos