Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,522 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amber Heard results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 630 hits . Analysis detected 6,602 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,870 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (30,225 of 37,536 keywords). This Amber Heard is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group. Amber Heard
Keyword details
Total words: 8,870
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst