Keyword summary
87% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,245 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Seyfried results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 2,154 hits . Analysis detected 8,968 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,735 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,428 of 37,536 keywords). This Amanda Seyfried is worse (more manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group. Amanda Seyfried
Keyword details
Total words: 6,735
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.6% percentile 3.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 32.0% 32.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 32.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst