Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 578 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alphonso Davies results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 1,368 hits . Analysis detected 7,983 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,240 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (26,974 of 37,533 keywords). This Alphonso Davies is better (less manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group. Alphonso Davies
Keyword details
Total words: 10,240
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst