Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,238 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Allen Hamilton results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 509 hits. Analysis detected 4,318 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,952 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (21,752 of 35,184 keywords). This Allen Hamilton is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Allen Hamilton
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
39%Allen Hamilton (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,952
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

38% percentile
025507510038.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos