Keyword summary
22% 3 analyzed articles/videos 354 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alina Habba results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 774 hits . Analysis detected 5,318 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,906 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (25,165 of 35,675 keywords). This Alina Habba is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group. Alina Habba
Keyword details
Total words: 5,906
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst