Keyword summary
33%1 analyzed article/video956 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Align Initiative results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 336 hits. Analysis detected 2,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (20,587 of 37,536 keywords). This Align Initiative is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Align Initiative
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
46%Align Initiative (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,868
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510045.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%No True Scotsman: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Red Herring: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos