Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Albinism results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 1,370 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,219 of 37,533 keywords). This Albinism is better (less manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Albinism
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
49%Albinism (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,796
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

49% percentile
025507510048.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos