Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Alberta Provincial Government results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 541 hits. Analysis detected 4,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,712 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Alberta Provincial Government is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Alberta Provincial Government
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 8,712
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos