Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aim Sports Group results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 69.8% saturation with 1,546 hits. Analysis detected 4,811 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (2,363 of 37,536 keywords). This Aim Sports Group is worse (more manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
Aim Sports Group
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠94%Aim Sports Group (selected)10%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,216
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

94% percentile
025507510093.7% percentile
9.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 69.8%69.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 25.8%25.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 22.2%22.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 16.8%16.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 69.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 25.8%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.0%Special Pleading: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos