Keyword summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aid Cuts results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 359 hits. Analysis detected 3,108 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,436 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (12,393 of 37,536 keywords). This Aid Cuts is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group.
Aid Cuts
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠67%Aid Cuts (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510067.0% percentile
3.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.4%5.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 8.5%8.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate