Keyword summary
β 0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aid Cuts results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 359 hits . Analysis detected 3,108 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,436 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of β 67% (12,393 of 37,536 keywords). This Aid Cuts is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Aid Cuts
Keyword details
Total words: 2,436
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.0% percentile 3.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0β50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst