Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video925 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Trial results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 430 hits. Analysis detected 3,320 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,576 of 37,536 keywords). This Ai Trial is worse (more manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Ai Trial
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
51%Ai Trial (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,700
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510050.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos