Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Investments results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 598 hits . Analysis detected 3,379 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 66% (12,345 of 35,675 keywords). This Ai Investments is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group. Ai Investments
Keyword details
Total words: 3,432
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.4% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 17.4% 17.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst