Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These AI Czar results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 183 hits . Analysis detected 1,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,554 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,710 keywords). This AI Czar is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. AI Czar
Keyword details
Total words: 1,554
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Red Herring: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst