Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These AI Czar results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 183 hits. Analysis detected 1,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,554 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,710 keywords). This AI Czar is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
AI Czar
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%AI Czar (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,554
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Red Herring: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos