Keyword summary
13%2 analyzed articles/videos1,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aging In Place results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 276 hits. Analysis detected 2,934 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,188 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (36,887 of 37,536 keywords). This Aging In Place is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
Aging In Place
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
2%Aging In Place (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,188
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751001.7% percentile
1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate