Keyword summary
82%1 analyzed article/video866 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Afghans results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 999 hits. Analysis detected 5,473 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,064 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (13,932 of 37,536 keywords). This Afghans is worse (more manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Afghans
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
63%Afghans (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,064
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510062.9% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 19.7%19.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos