Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Afghanistan War results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 633 hits. Analysis detected 6,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,676 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,533 keywords). This Afghanistan War is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Afghanistan War
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Afghanistan War (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,676
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos