Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Affordable Evs results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 823 hits. Analysis detected 4,282 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,548 of 37,536 keywords). This Affordable Evs is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Affordable Evs
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
59%Affordable Evs (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,992
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510058.6% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 20.6%20.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos