Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video776 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adrienne Adams results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34% saturation with 792 hits. Analysis detected 3,465 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 89% (6,408 of 56,400 keywords). This Adrienne Adams is worse (more manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group.
Adrienne Adams
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
89%Adrienne Adams (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,328
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

89% percentile
025507510088.6% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 19.2%19.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 34.0%34.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 34.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos