Keyword summary
38% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,321 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adem Bona results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 820 hits . Analysis detected 5,956 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,808 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,202 of 37,536 keywords). This Adem Bona is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Adem Bona
Keyword details
Total words: 7,808
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst