Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video238 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adelita Grijalva results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 252 hits. Analysis detected 1,942 faulty-reasoning hits from 952 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (2,660 of 37,536 keywords). This Adelita Grijalva is worse (more manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group.
Adelita Grijalva
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠93%Adelita Grijalva (selected)9%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 952
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

93% percentile
025507510092.9% percentile
8.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles952 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 21.2%21.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 26.5%26.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 17.5%17.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 17.3%17.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 26.5%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 21.2%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.9%No True Scotsman: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos