Keyword summary
89%1 analyzed article/video1,330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Achraf Akimi results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 1,091 hits. Analysis detected 6,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,990 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (9,266 of 35,718 keywords). This Achraf Akimi is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Achraf Akimi
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
75%Achraf Akimi (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,990
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

74% percentile
025507510074.1% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 25.2%25.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 27.3%27.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 27.3%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 25.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos