Keyword summary
17%1 analyzed article/video1,165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aca Subsidies results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 233 hits. Analysis detected 1,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,495 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,262 of 36,701 keywords). This Aca Subsidies is better (less manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group.
Aca Subsidies
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
13%Aca Subsidies (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,495
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

12% percentile
025507510012.1% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Straw Man: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos