Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video675 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 911 Transcript results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 572 hits. Analysis detected 2,435 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,025 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (7,445 of 37,536 keywords). This 911 Transcript is worse (more manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group.
911 Transcript
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠81%911 Transcript (selected)6%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,025
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

80% percentile
025507510080.2% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 28.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Red Herring: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.6%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Tu Quoque: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos