Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,367 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 101 Best Restaurants results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.2% saturation with 5,532 hits. Analysis detected 20,848 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,433 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,633 of 37,536 keywords). This 101 Best Restaurants is worse (more manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group.
101 Best Restaurants
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
69%101 Best Restaurants (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 13,433
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510069.0% percentile
3.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 41.2%41.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 22.4%22.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 41.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 22.4%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos