UnHerd⁠69%

The Brexit report is built on fake data ⁠99%

By Billy Stephens⁠0%

7/1/2026, 7:52:10 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 700 faulty-reasoning hits from 61 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (259 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 98.80% of the article peer group.

In this episode of The Econoclasts, Yanis Varoufakis and Wolfgang Munchau debunk the popular orthodoxy surrounding Brexit, exposing the phony statistics used to fabricate a narrative of British macroeconomic self-harm, while dissecting the existential reality of Germany’s inevitable structural collapse through its automakers’ loss of the critical AI and EV race to China. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 100.0%Billy Stephens: 23.6%Unherd: 6.6%Confirmation Bias100.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 2.4%Unherd: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 7.9%Unherd: 3.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 1.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 8.2%Unherd: 1.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 100.0%Billy Stephens: 12.8%Unherd: 2.7%Overconfidence Bias100.0%This article: 86.9%Billy Stephens: 29.4%Unherd: 5.1%Framing Effect86.9%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 3.8%Unherd: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 1.3%Unherd: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 1.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 86.9%Billy Stephens: 19.0%Unherd: 3.0%Pessimism Bias86.9%This article: 13.1%Billy Stephens: 28.8%Unherd: 10.7%Negativity Bias13.1%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 2.5%Unherd: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.9%Unherd: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 6.7%Unherd: 1.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 1.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.3%Unherd: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 2.6%Unherd: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 2.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 8.2%Unherd: 1.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 86.9%Billy Stephens: 14.4%Unherd: 3.2%Appeal to Authority86.9%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 9.7%Unherd: 3.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 6.6%Unherd: 2.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 1.3%Unherd: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 100.0%Billy Stephens: 28.2%Unherd: 13.8%Hasty Generalization100.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 3.2%Unherd: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 100.0%Billy Stephens: 17.7%Unherd: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion100.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 4.9%Unherd: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 86.9%Billy Stephens: 12.1%Unherd: 3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)86.9%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 0.4%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 4.1%Unherd: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 86.9%Billy Stephens: 1.9%Unherd: 0.8%Composition/Division86.9%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 4.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 1.9%Unherd: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.0%Unherd: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.3%Unherd: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 0.9%Unherd: 2.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 3.8%Unherd: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 100.0%Billy Stephens: 26.5%Unherd: 13.9%Biased Writer Voice100.0%This article: 100.0%Billy Stephens: 16.4%Unherd: 2.3%Indoctrination100.0%This article: 100.0%Billy Stephens: 18.4%Unherd: 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias100.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 1.2%Unherd: 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Billy Stephens: 1.9%Unherd: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

61 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker87%attributed speech8writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageYanis Varoufakis • 53 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Yanis Varoufakis

100%flagged-word coverage
53 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+0.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%Yanis Varoufakis: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination+0.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%Yanis Varoufakis: 100.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B+0.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%Yanis Varoufakis: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.