CBS News97%

Key facts about hantavirus 81%

5/9/2026, 6:09:53 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 1,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 617 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 72% and a BS Rank of 81% (4,206 of 21,145 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 80.10% of the video peer group.

We're joined by CBS News medical correspondent Dr. Celine Gounder. 
She is also an editor at large of public health at KFF News and she is an infectious disease expert. 
So, we are so thankful that you're here today, Dr. Gounder. 
So, the WHO, the World Health Organization, says that the risk, of course, is low, but people are still really concerned. 
I mean, COVID feels like it just happened. 
What do people need to know? 
The way in which hantavirus, including the Andes virus, is transmitted from person to person is different from COVID. 
So, COVID was an airborne infection, much more easily transmissible, more along the lines of flu or measles, where you could have somebody in a room who's infectious, they leave the room, hours later somebody else can be infected. 
With hantavirus, you need very intimate close contact. 
In fact, the biggest cluster of Andes virus, the one that's transmitted from person to person, it was largely sexual contact. 
Not that it's sexually transmitted, but it's that level of intimate close contact that you need in order to transmit. 
So, this is not It doesn't have the biology that you need in order for it to become a pandemic. 
And I and I appreciate that because I think that taking the temperature down, really giving that context, is very important so that we don't spiral. 
Um there is a flight attendant that tested tested negative for the virus, [clears throat] and of course some passengers left at some point, they flew back, and there was an infected passenger who later died on this plane that the flight attendant was on. 
How significant is it that that flight attendant tested negative? 
This was a big sigh of relief for those of us infectious disease specialists and so on who are following this closely because it is further confirmation that this is very difficult to transmit. 
So, this was a highly infectious patient, you know, as hantavirus goes, Andes virus goes, uh very sick, and the flight attendant had relatively close contact, but not, you know, intimate contact with this passenger, had some symptoms unrelated to hantavirus or Andes virus, uh and tested negative. 
So, for us this was further reassurance that this is hard to transmit that way. 
So, for the Americans on the ship, what's the plan for them? 
And how do how does our government prepare to make sure that they don't possibly spread this if any of them are infected? 
So, the CDC is deploying a team of epidemiologists and medical professionals to the Canary Islands. 
They'll assess each American's level of exposure. 
How much were they exposed to somebody who had hantavirus? 
From there, they will fly on a government medical repatriation flight to Nebraska. 
They'll go to the National Quarantine Center in Nebraska, at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. 
This is the only federally funded quarantine site in the country. 
A second CDC team will be deploying to receive them there. 
And Nebraska has practice with this. 
They had had dealt with the early COVID cruise ship outbreak and those quarantines. 
The seven Americans who left earlier are being monitored in five different states across the country. 
And the WHO is saying that at at a minimum, people who were on the ship who were exposed should be monitored for 42 days. 
Okay. 
So, bottom line, no one should be changing their summer plans, anything like that. 
You don't have to buy toilet paper in bulk. 
>> [laughter] 
>> Don't stock up on your masks. 
>> Okay. All right. Perfect. Dr. Gounder, thank you so much for joining us this morning. Really appreciate it. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.9%CBS Miami: 2.2%Confirmation Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%CBS Miami: 2.5%Availability Heuristic7.3%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 11.3%CBS Miami: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias11.3%This article: 7.0%CBS Miami: 6.0%Framing Effect7.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%CBS Miami: 1.9%Optimism Bias5.5%This article: 4.2%CBS Miami: 1.1%Pessimism Bias4.2%This article: 14.4%CBS Miami: 6.7%Negativity Bias14.4%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%CBS Miami: 0.9%In-Group Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%CBS Miami: 1.7%Halo Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.3%CBS Miami: 1.1%Recency Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 25.4%CBS Miami: 4.3%Appeal to Authority25.4%This article: 3.1%CBS Miami: 1.1%False Dilemma3.1%This article: 4.2%CBS Miami: 0.5%Slippery Slope4.2%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 19.4%CBS Miami: 2.5%Hasty Generalization19.4%This article: 1.5%CBS Miami: 0.1%Red Herring1.5%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.5%CBS Miami: 4.1%Appeal to Emotion12.5%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 3.2%CBS Miami: 0.1%Appeal to Nature3.2%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 19.8%CBS Miami: 1.2%Anecdotal19.8%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 1.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 6.5%CBS Miami: 0.9%Indoctrination6.5%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

617 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker65%attributed speech218writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 39 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 34 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 48 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 14 words • 100.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDr. Celine Gounder • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Dr. Celine Gounder

81%flagged-word coverage
399 attributed words100% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Indoctrination+2.9 ptsWriter: 4.6%Dr. Celine Gounder: 7.5%7.5%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.