Tributes paid to Kaylee Hottle ⁠87%

7/22/2026, 5:12:51 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 54.2% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 534 faulty-reasoning hits from 166 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 79.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (2,873 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the video peer group.

Tributes are being paid to Kaylee 
Hottle, a deaf actor known for her work 
in two Godzilla films, who died in a car 
crash in Maryland on Tuesday, aged 18. 
Millie Bobby Brown, who starred opposite Hottle in Godzilla vs. Kong, wrote on Instagram, "I'm so devastated to hear this. You will be deeply missed, Kaylee." 
Other stars remembering the late actor 
include Rebecca Hall and Millie Bobby Brown, who said, "I'm absolutely gutted about the passing of sweet Kaylee 
Hottle. May her beauty and talent be a memory for eternity." 
Hottle was one of two passengers in the car when it went off the road and hit a culvert before 3:00 a.m. 
Excessive speed is believed to be a factor in the crash, which is under investigation. 
Hottle's father, Joshua, reached out to the driver, described by the sheriff's office as a 19-year-old man. 
"I have forgiven you," he said. "Don't let this incident ruin the rest of your life." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.0%Associated Press: 1.8%Confirmation Bias9.0%This article: 5.4%Associated Press: 0.6%Anchoring Bias5.4%This article: 33.7%Associated Press: 2.6%Availability Heuristic33.7%This article: 4.8%Associated Press: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic4.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 17.5%Associated Press: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias17.5%This article: 6.6%Associated Press: 4.7%Framing Effect6.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.6%Associated Press: 2.7%Optimism Bias9.6%This article: 6.6%Associated Press: 2.2%Pessimism Bias6.6%This article: 21.7%Associated Press: 6.2%Negativity Bias21.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Associated Press: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error10.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 38.0%Associated Press: 1.4%Halo Effect38.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 10.8%Associated Press: 0.1%Primacy Effect10.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 27.7%Associated Press: 3.5%Appeal to Authority27.7%This article: 9.6%Associated Press: 0.8%False Dilemma9.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 5.4%Associated Press: 0.0%Red Herring5.4%This article: 19.3%Associated Press: 0.3%Bandwagon19.3%This article: 54.2%Associated Press: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion54.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 9.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Burden of Proof9.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 22.3%Associated Press: 1.2%Anecdotal22.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

166 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers53%attributed speech78writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMillie Bobby Brown • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMillie Bobby Brown • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMillie Bobby Brown • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJoshua • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJoshua • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Millie Bobby Brown

100%flagged-word coverage
55 attributed words63% of attributed speech100% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.