Fox News98%

Hegseth RIPS 'stale thinking' under Biden: 'I don't know what Lloyd Austin did for 4 years’ #shorts 92%

7/21/2026, 11:30:01 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43.3% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 934 faulty-reasoning hits from 307 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 86.9% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,749 of 21,886 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 92.00% of the video peer group.

It's my understanding that this whole supplemental B funding request is $87.6 billion 
and most of the funding, 67 billion, is for the Department of Defense. 
Yet, we were told the Department of Defense still has 75 billion in unobligated funding from last year's reconciliation package. 
Is that true? 
>> Roughly correct numbers, yes. 
>> So, you left some change on the dresser before you prepared to come for this hearing. 
What's going to happen to that 75 billion? 
>> Well, that 75 is there's plans and designs on that, part of the rebuild of our military which had to be undertaken. 
And so, one big beautiful bill gave us specific avenues. 
But, I'd have to get you the exact numbers of what that is left to be allocated. 
>> a war in Iran? 
>> No, this is this is rebuilding our military from what was not funded in the past under the Biden administration. 
So, 
that's these are this is from 2026 one big beautiful bill which which helped move the president's priorities like Golden Dome for America, move away from all the woke priorities of of what the Biden administration was pursuing, give us a chance to start cutting these deals 
on munitions. 
All the things that we he the president wanted us to focus on 
shipbuilding, hypersonics. I mean, the 
Biden administration ignored hypersonics. 
They just decided to pretend like that technology didn't exist and we shouldn't invest in it. 
There are thing I don't know what Lloyd Austin did for 4 years. 
I really don't. 
>> sure 
>> The amount of neglect, the amount of stale thinking and bureaucracy 
>> proceed if I might before you get into your next topic. 
Let me interrupt your response 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.5%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias6.5%This article: 8.5%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias8.5%This article: 10.1%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic10.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 13.4%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias13.4%This article: 40.4%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect40.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 43.3%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias43.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error10.7%This article: 6.5%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias6.5%This article: 15.3%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias15.3%This article: 8.1%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias8.1%This article: 3.3%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect1.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem10.7%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.5%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority6.5%This article: 17.9%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma17.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.9%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization16.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 34.9%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion34.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 15.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof15.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.2%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 5.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity5.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.5%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote6.5%This article: 5.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection5.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

307 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker5.2%attributed speech291writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLloyd Austin • 13 words • 0.0% coverageLloyd Austin • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lloyd Austin

100%flagged-word coverage
16 attributed words100% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Unattributed Quote-6.9 ptsWriter: 6.9%Lloyd Austin: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-5.8 ptsWriter: 5.8%Lloyd Austin: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.