Coast Guard will suspend its search after boat sinks near Alcatraz Island ⁠87%

7/15/2026, 5:09:40 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Burden of Proof, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 1,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 317 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 79.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (2,891 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 86.80% of the video peer group.

Our crews have now been out there for 23 hours straight. 
They've cumulatively covered 950 square nautical miles. 
In addition, they've searched over 1,700 miles of track line utilizing 11 surface assets and four aircraft. 
We have completely saturated the search area. 
Despite that extensive effort, we have been unsuccessful in locating any survivors within the search area. 
That said, as I look at the extensive search effort we have put forth to this point, 
I look at the probability of success of locating a survivor within the search area given everything we put forth and all the environmental conditions, my intention is to suspend active search operations at sunset this evening. 
We have one individual who has been declared deceased. 
We have one canine who has been declared deceased. 
We have three members uh who were rescued and brought to Gas House Cove and transported to the emergency room who have now been released from the hospital and are doing okay. 
We have 13 members who were rescued and brought to Gas House Cove who received services in the reunification center and are now home safe. 
We currently have three individuals who are still unaccounted for and the search continues and will continue until the Coast Guard uh deems it to discontinue. 
What I can say is a 49-ft cabin cruiser 
um had three different levels to the to the vessel. 
Uh there was the weather back up above with a canopy, but then 
there was the main deck and a lower deck that were both are both enclosed. 
Uh so there is a high possibility that uh individuals could have been trapped inside the vessel. 
We've done survivor debriefs and we do know that individuals were in the main deck and potentially below deck, so we know there were there were folks there. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.0%Associated Press: 1.8%Confirmation Bias5.0%This article: 5.4%Associated Press: 0.6%Anchoring Bias5.4%This article: 17.7%Associated Press: 2.6%Availability Heuristic17.7%This article: 6.9%Associated Press: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic6.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 28.1%Associated Press: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias28.1%This article: 5.4%Associated Press: 4.7%Framing Effect5.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 8.2%Associated Press: 0.4%Status Quo Bias8.2%This article: 15.1%Associated Press: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect15.1%This article: 20.2%Associated Press: 2.7%Optimism Bias20.2%This article: 17.0%Associated Press: 2.2%Pessimism Bias17.0%This article: 19.6%Associated Press: 6.2%Negativity Bias19.6%This article: 5.4%Associated Press: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 13.6%Associated Press: 1.4%Halo Effect13.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Associated Press: 0.1%Primacy Effect2.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 30.6%Associated Press: 3.5%Appeal to Authority30.6%This article: 5.0%Associated Press: 0.8%False Dilemma5.0%This article: 8.2%Associated Press: 0.3%Slippery Slope8.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.2%Associated Press: 2.4%Hasty Generalization2.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 7.9%Associated Press: 0.3%Bandwagon7.9%This article: 23.7%Associated Press: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion23.7%This article: 5.4%Associated Press: 0.4%Begging the Question5.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 25.9%Associated Press: 0.4%Burden of Proof25.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.5%Associated Press: 0.3%Composition/Division3.5%This article: 18.9%Associated Press: 1.2%Anecdotal18.9%This article: 2.8%Associated Press: 0.0%No True Scotsman2.8%This article: 15.8%Associated Press: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)15.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

317 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.