Fox News98%

Joey Jones: Democrats let the intrusive thoughts win #democrats #shorts #politics 99%

5/11/2026, 12:00:15 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.9% saturation with 239 hits. Analysis detected 1,895 faulty-reasoning hits from 521 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 98.9% and a BS Rank of 99% (322 of 20,247 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 98.40% of the video peer group.

You have an entire class of Democrats in this country and leftist progressives 
who to Joey's point are true believers 
that actually advocate for the criminals 
and the violent folks on the streets more so than they do the victims and the decent folks. And they are committed to that platform. 
You know, Joey, what's kind of interesting to me about this is it would be one thing if you had politicians standing up there and taking a civil libertarian view on this about potential violations of the rights of American citizens with the technology, 
but especially in the last clip that we played, they're not even pretending it's about that. It's entirely about protecting these rights, quote and quote, of illegal immigrants. 
Yeah, that's I'm glad you asked that cuz that's really what I wanted to talk about cuz the last thing I heard her say there was this surveillance state. 
And that that's something that kind of peaks the interest of libertarians, especially people on the right. 
We don't want to be that we don't want them to use technology to come after our rights as citizens and that's what the Democrats would have done. 
I think what makes me so aggravated at this or just so upset about this is when these things were in place and Donald Trump wasn't president and ICE wasn't going after illegal aliens, they were great. 
They loved them. So, whatever rights they infringe upon like these cameras, it's okay to infringe upon the rights of citizens. 
It's okay to go after people that you or or to keep the big government eye on people as long as it's American citizens 
because in the eyes of Democrats, especially these far-left Democrats, we're almost at fault because of our entitlement and our privilege. 
I mean, Sheridan Gorman gets murdered and what did they say? 
They they let the intrusive thoughts win, right? They say the quiet part out loud. She was in the wrong place. 
I mean, what does that say? She's entitled. 
She thinks she can just go anywhere and have fun and do whatever. 
Who does she think she is? I mean, that's basically what they were saying. 
The same thing is evident in saying. The same thing is evident in stuff like this. It's okay to put up cameras and stalk citizens based on if they're speeding or if they do something that you don't like, whatever it is, or maybe if they go out in public, during COVID, we'll use all of this for for that. 
But if you're going to use it to get illegal aliens that might be committing crimes, apparently to no fault of their own, if you're going to use it to go get them, well, that's just too much. 
Now we're surveillance state. 
They have more empathy and more righteous indignation for these illegal aliens than they do the citizens in this country cuz in the back of their minds, their message is we as citizens are oppressors, we're privileged, and we deserve it. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.0%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.6%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic13.6%This article: 2.5%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.5%This article: 7.1%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias7.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect8.4%This article: 8.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion8.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.4%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias14.4%This article: 45.9%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias45.9%This article: 4.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias4.0%This article: 13.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error13.2%This article: 9.4%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias9.4%This article: 14.8%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias14.8%This article: 14.4%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias14.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias5.6%This article: 2.5%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem1.2%This article: 9.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man9.0%This article: 8.4%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority8.4%This article: 22.6%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma22.6%This article: 11.5%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope11.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 29.6%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization29.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.3%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon3.3%This article: 35.5%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion35.5%This article: 13.2%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question13.2%This article: 7.1%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.1%This article: 4.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque4.0%This article: 9.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof9.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.5%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division2.5%This article: 29.4%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal29.4%This article: 4.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman4.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 4.6%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading4.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

521 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.