Tom Hanks and Tim Allen celebrate 'Toy Story 5' ⁠82%

5/29/2026, 12:53:43 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 642 faulty-reasoning hits from 291 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 73.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,802 of 20,245 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 81.20% of the video peer group.

Buzz Lightyear is insane. 
>> It's been too long, Woody. Came here as fast as I could after Jessie called for help. 
>> Oh, thank you. Thank you. 
>> Tom and I go to lunch a lot and if if we're ever talking in a group, people would come up What no matter what age group now cuz we started this 30 years ago. Some of them are could be our neighbors and others have come from the other side of the planet. 
Are you guys What are you guys doing? 
Why are you mimicking those voices? They can't quite fathom that Woody and Buzz are having spaghetti together in the same place that they're having spaghetti 
and 
>> You know, it's just a power of the situation. 
>> Look, Star>> Deputy>> No, Star. 
>> Oh, hey Buzz. What is that? 
>> What? Where? 
>> When I have been to let's say for example of a theme parks and I will see Woody dancing with Captain Hook and Cinderella and and Goofy and I just like There I am and there I will be for the rest of time. 
It blows me out of my heart. I can't I can't quite fathom how this happened. 
>> She's getting away, Buzz. 
>> ENJOY THE GARAGE, STINKY PETE. HELLO, BILL. 
>> Stinky Pete. Hello, Bill. 
>> Here's how we can all protect ourselves from tech. Are you ready for this? 
>> has a message. 
>> Put it down. Turn it off. Do something else. 
>> No way. 
>> Come on, Bullseye. 
>> Hey, WAIT FOR US. 
>> CAR. 
>> YOU GOT A FRIEND IN ME. 
>> CLEAR. 
>> Disney and Pixar's Toy Story 5. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 24.1%Associated Press: 2.9%Availability Heuristic24.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 18.9%Associated Press: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias18.9%This article: 8.6%Associated Press: 4.9%Framing Effect8.6%This article: 8.6%Associated Press: 0.7%Loss Aversion8.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 15.5%Associated Press: 2.6%Optimism Bias15.5%This article: 1.0%Associated Press: 1.9%Pessimism Bias1.0%This article: 20.3%Associated Press: 7.0%Negativity Bias20.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Associated Press: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error1.4%This article: 6.2%Associated Press: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias6.2%This article: 4.1%Associated Press: 0.9%In-Group Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Associated Press: 1.8%Halo Effect4.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.4%Associated Press: 1.1%Recency Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Associated Press: 0.3%Ad Hominem1.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.4%Associated Press: 3.8%Appeal to Authority2.4%This article: 2.7%Associated Press: 0.8%False Dilemma2.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 18.9%Associated Press: 2.4%Hasty Generalization18.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 17.2%Associated Press: 4.0%Appeal to Emotion17.2%This article: 1.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Begging the Question1.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.2%Associated Press: 0.6%Burden of Proof5.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 15.5%Associated Press: 1.0%Anecdotal15.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 22.3%Associated Press: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)22.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 14.4%Associated Press: 0.0%Personal Incredulity14.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 5.2%Associated Press: 1.3%Indoctrination5.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

291 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers3.8%attributed speech280writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageBuzz Lightyear • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 55 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDisney and Pixar • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Buzz Lightyear

100%flagged-word coverage
4 attributed words36% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Indoctrination-5.4 ptsWriter: 5.4%Buzz Lightyear: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.