CBS News98%

Trump says Iran would've hit Israel with a nuclear weapon if he hadn't been elected #shorts 98%

7/24/2026, 6:55:36 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Negativity Bias, and Burden of Proof, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 61% saturation with 247 hits. Analysis detected 1,983 faulty-reasoning hits from 405 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 97.9% and a BS Rank of 98% (438 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 98.00% of the video peer group.

At what point with Iran, do you think they're going to cry uncle and come to the actually come to the table? 
>> Well, I you know, maybe they will cry 
uncle and maybe they'll just give up or maybe they're just going to a cave and hide. 
You know, they have caves very deep in the ground and they can hide. 
It's they get shaken up pretty good, but they can hide. 
But we've taken out their first level of leadership. We've then taken out their second level of of leadership. We've taken out some of the third level. 
And we're negotiating with the rest. 
And we'll see how that works. 
And right now we are talking to them seriously, 
but you know, I've talked to them before and they don't seem to be able to get there. 
Maybe now they will. 
But uh 
You know, look, 
if I thought they were anywhere near getting a nuclear weapon. If I didn't come If I wasn't elected, Israel would, in my opinion, not be around anymore. They would have been hit by a nuclear weapon. And that includes right at the beginning with Barack Hussein Obama's nuclear deal that was so bad with Iran. 
That was a road to a nuclear weapon. 
And maybe even more so the B-2 bombers. 
If that plane right there, that plane, that beautiful plane, the wing carries the largest bombs in the world. 
If that bomb didn't go over there, 17-hour flight, and it hit every one of those bombs hit their target and the target was an air shaft at 2:00 in the morning. It's hard to believe, right? 
Going at very tremendous speeds. 
Every one of them hit and blew it to hell. 
If that didn't happen, they would have had a nuclear weapon and there would be no Israel. 
If I wasn't here, if I wasn't president, 
there would be no Israel and there probably would be no Middle East. And you saw that when they shockingly started shooting at everybody all over 
the Middle East. If they had a nuclear weapon, they would have used that. There might not be a Middle East as we know it today, but there definitely, in my opinion, there would not have been an Israel. 
Israel. Thank you very much, everybody. 
Thank you. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.7%CBS Miami: 2.2%Confirmation Bias6.7%This article: 7.4%CBS Miami: 0.6%Anchoring Bias7.4%This article: 28.9%CBS Miami: 2.5%Availability Heuristic28.9%This article: 3.5%CBS Miami: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic3.5%This article: 15.3%CBS Miami: 0.5%Hindsight Bias15.3%This article: 52.3%CBS Miami: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias52.3%This article: 4.0%CBS Miami: 6.1%Framing Effect4.0%This article: 13.8%CBS Miami: 0.3%Loss Aversion13.8%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.7%CBS Miami: 1.9%Optimism Bias4.7%This article: 4.2%CBS Miami: 1.1%Pessimism Bias4.2%This article: 47.7%CBS Miami: 6.7%Negativity Bias47.7%This article: 42.7%CBS Miami: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias42.7%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 4.4%CBS Miami: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%CBS Miami: 1.6%Halo Effect7.4%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.6%CBS Miami: 1.1%Recency Bias8.6%This article: 0.7%CBS Miami: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.7%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.9%CBS Miami: 4.3%Appeal to Authority10.9%This article: 37.8%CBS Miami: 1.1%False Dilemma37.8%This article: 6.2%CBS Miami: 0.4%Slippery Slope6.2%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.9%CBS Miami: 2.5%Hasty Generalization9.9%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 19.8%CBS Miami: 4.1%Appeal to Emotion19.8%This article: 2.0%CBS Miami: 0.7%Begging the Question2.0%This article: 24.4%CBS Miami: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)24.4%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 44.4%CBS Miami: 0.4%Burden of Proof44.4%This article: 4.7%CBS Miami: 0.1%Appeal to Nature4.7%This article: 9.9%CBS Miami: 0.2%Composition/Division9.9%This article: 61.0%CBS Miami: 1.2%Anecdotal61.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.4%CBS Miami: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.4%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 1.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

405 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker14%attributed speech349writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 56 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
56 attributed words100% of attributed speech97% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.