CBS News98%

Artemis II astronaut Reid Wiseman details unexpected glitch on mission #shorts 95%

4/16/2026, 5:49:38 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 129 hits. Analysis detected 911 faulty-reasoning hits from 466 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 91% and a BS Rank of 95% (1,238 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 94.30% of the video peer group.

I just want to say 100% point blank that was a wonderful toilet. 
The toilet worked great. 
Where we had an issue, and it was it was an issue for sure, is that our primary vent line, which takes, you know, when you go to the bathroom at the end of doing that, you flush the toilet. 
The toilet flushed just fine, but then when the liquid went out the bottom of the toilet, it got clogged up in our vent line. 
And our tank can only hold about, you know, maybe maybe I'm I'm guessing like under 10 uh urination events, I guess, that tank can hold. 
And then it's got to be dumped. 
And for the first two days of the mission, it was fun to watch that thing get dumped. 
I mean, that is an interesting thing to see out the window. 
Uh it's just like a billion little tiny flexcks of of ice heading out into deep space. 
Um but that primary vent line got clogged or gked or we'll wait and see exactly what the technical reason was and that put a limitation on us. 
So I definitely for those great engineers that made that toilet, I don't want them hanging their head low. 
They should hang it very high. 
It was it was a great piece of gear. 
And then what did we what do we learn? 
Like there's always things we need to improve. 
I think the thing, just speaking for myself, the thing that really surprised me on this mission was how well the spacecraft handled and how well the machine supported the four humans on board. 
Uh we were a little cold the first two days. 
They warmed it up. 
They like they fixed everything that we asked. 
Um the thing that we need to probably work on for the next mission is now we know the things that we didn't know before we launched. 
like when you want to go into a bag and get lunch, but you got to dig through a thousand different things to get to lunch, it makes it really hard and cumbersome to eat in a very busy day. 
Um there are different ways that we could manage the the cabin during workout. 
Like we have learned all these little nuances that we can make Artemis 3, four, five just bring the gains down on those things so that they can focus, which we've always had on their task, rendevousing a spacecraft in orbit, getting on the lunar surface and building a sustainable presence on the on the moon. 
We hold the key to that lock and we've already started debriefing so that they don't have to worry about that 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 22.1%CBS Miami: 2.2%Confirmation Bias22.1%This article: 5.6%CBS Miami: 0.6%Anchoring Bias5.6%This article: 12.2%CBS Miami: 2.5%Availability Heuristic12.2%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 11.8%CBS Miami: 0.5%Hindsight Bias11.8%This article: 7.3%CBS Miami: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias7.3%This article: 8.8%CBS Miami: 6.1%Framing Effect8.8%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.7%CBS Miami: 0.6%Status Quo Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 27.7%CBS Miami: 1.9%Optimism Bias27.7%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%CBS Miami: 6.7%Negativity Bias2.4%This article: 4.1%CBS Miami: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%CBS Miami: 1.6%Halo Effect10.5%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%CBS Miami: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect5.6%This article: 8.6%CBS Miami: 1.1%Recency Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 4.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 5.8%CBS Miami: 0.1%Circular Reasoning5.8%This article: 12.2%CBS Miami: 2.5%Hasty Generalization12.2%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.1%CBS Miami: 4.1%Appeal to Emotion4.1%This article: 2.8%CBS Miami: 0.7%Begging the Question2.8%This article: 5.4%CBS Miami: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.4%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.9%CBS Miami: 1.2%Anecdotal7.9%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 26.6%CBS Miami: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)26.6%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.4%CBS Miami: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection2.4%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 1.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

466 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker98%attributed speech11writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 13 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 4 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 40 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 25 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 26 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 7 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 18 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 12 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 17 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 28 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 19 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 6 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 9 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 9 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 8 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 34 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 10 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 4 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 8 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 27 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 40 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 14 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 56 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Reid Wiseman

89%flagged-word coverage
455 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection-100.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%Reid Wiseman: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.