Fox News98%

'TERRIFYING!': US city LOSES HUNDREDS of suspects on ankle monitors 95%

5/15/2026, 12:15:00 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 1,271 faulty-reasoning hits from 452 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 91.4% and a BS Rank of 95% (1,123 of 20,247 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 94.50% of the video peer group.

Sandra. 
>> Now, Bill, shocking details out of the Chicago area. 
A judge says they have lost track of hundreds of people who were placed on ankle monitors, all while facing pending criminal cases. 
The total number now thought to be at nearly 250 people. 
Terrifying. 
Mike Tobin is live in Chicago. 
He's got more details on this for us. 
Hi, Mike. 
And Sandra, it works out to 8% of the people on electronic monitoring in the pre-trial program in Cook County and Chicago who are unaccounted for. 
Even the state's attorney says we should all be deeply concerned. 
This is the same system that was ignored by Lawrence Reed, a career violent criminal with 72 arrests. 
His ankle monitor showed that he'd been out all night twice and was violating his curfew on November 17th of last year when police say he boarded Chicago's Elra and set a complete stranger, Bethany McGee, on fire. 
This is the same ankle monitor system that was ignored by 26-year-old Alfonso Tally. 
Records show he'd been in trouble for all of his adult life. 
He disregarded his curfew to the point that he didn't get home to charge the battery in the ankle monitor went dead. 
Police say on April 25th he went on a crime spree that ended with a mother of three pistol whipped with a broken nose. 
One police officer dead, another fighting for his life. 
3,048 people were released pre-trial on electronic monitoring. 
Almost 20% of them are charged with violent crimes. 
7% aggravated battery, 4% criminal sexual assault, 8% charged with murder, and 246 of them cannot be found. 
>> Not only are they missing, they have no idea they're at none. 
Zero. 
They don't know in the state of Illinois. 
They don't no idea where these individuals are. 
So, think about that. 
It's not like they could just go out and start looking for them. 
Like, they have no clue. 
The system alerts on a low battery or 
curfew violation. After 48 hours, a judge can be notified and that judge can issue an arrest warrant. 
But any sheriff's deputy will tell you there are thousands of warrants in the system. 
Without an alert on a specific individual, they get lost in the pile. 
But the Cook County Chief Judge did tell a local reporter yesterday that law enforcement is actively searching for the people who are at large. 
Sandra, 
>> that's quite a search. 
Mike Tobin on that for us out of Chicago. 
Thank you, Bill. 
Be sure to like and subscribe for all the Fox News latest on YouTube and catch full shows streaming now on Fox 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.7%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias2.7%This article: 21.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias21.0%This article: 28.8%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic28.8%This article: 7.1%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic7.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias7.7%This article: 5.5%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect5.5%This article: 2.9%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion2.9%This article: 4.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 30.8%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias30.8%This article: 4.9%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias4.9%This article: 4.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error4.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect1.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.4%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority16.4%This article: 2.9%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma2.9%This article: 2.9%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope2.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 26.1%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization26.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.3%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon3.3%This article: 7.5%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion7.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 13.3%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division4.0%This article: 20.8%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal20.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 2.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy2.7%This article: 34.5%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote34.5%This article: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection2.2%This article: 7.3%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice7.3%This article: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias7.1%This article: 4.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.9%

452 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers68%attributed speech145writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageBill • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSandra • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageSandra • 11 words • 0.0% coverageSandra • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageSandra • 2 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageMike Tobin • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 38 words • 100.0% coverageMike Tobin • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 22 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 24 words • 100.0% coverageMike Tobin • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 9 words • 100.0% coverageMike Tobin • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMike Tobin • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSandra • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSandra • 3 words • 0.0% coverageFox News • 22 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Fox News

100%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words7.2% of attributed speech83% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Fox News: 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +93.1 ptsWriter: 6.9%Fox News: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-40.7 ptsWriter: 40.7%Fox News: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.9 ptsWriter: 15.9%Fox News: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-6.9 ptsWriter: 6.9%Fox News: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%Fox News: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.