Boots Riley on the bigger message behind 'I Love Boosters' ⁠95%

5/30/2026, 12:38:32 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Begging the Question, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 60.2% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 380 faulty-reasoning hits from 118 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 90.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (1,191 of 20,246 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 94.10% of the video peer group.

I've already written some stuff that um is crazier than this. 
So, so uh and but but also turning up the awesomeness. 
So, uh but but yeah, it's it's you know, it's it's the end goal for me what what what that is. 
And it's not really the movie, it's what I'm hoping the movie causes people to engage with, right? 
And um because we're we're at a place where we need to uh figure out how we can have power, right? 
How the how the working class can have power. 
And uh I think this movie engages in that and hopefully inspires people to uh collectivize struggles. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.3%Associated Press: 1.8%Confirmation Bias15.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Associated Press: 2.9%Availability Heuristic9.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Associated Press: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias9.3%This article: 47.5%Associated Press: 4.9%Framing Effect47.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 17.8%Associated Press: 0.5%Status Quo Bias17.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 16.9%Associated Press: 2.6%Optimism Bias16.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 7.0%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 17.8%Associated Press: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias17.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 17.8%Associated Press: 0.9%In-Group Bias17.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Associated Press: 0.2%Primacy Effect8.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 3.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 17.8%Associated Press: 0.8%False Dilemma17.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 32.2%Associated Press: 4.0%Appeal to Emotion32.2%This article: 29.7%Associated Press: 0.4%Begging the Question29.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.6%Associated Press: 1.0%Anecdotal7.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 60.2%Associated Press: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)60.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 14.4%Associated Press: 1.3%Indoctrination14.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

118 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.