The Guardian81%
Trump to impose fresh wave of tariffs on more than 80 countries 63%
By Gaya Gupta31% Shrai Popat41%
7/23/2026, 4:30:32 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Hindsight Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 778 faulty-reasoning hits from 710 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.6% and a BS Rank of 63% (8,277 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the article peer group.
Donald Trump’s administration has imposed a fresh wave of sweeping tariffs on dozens of US trading partners to replace a 10% global duty that was set to expire early Friday morning – the latest attempt to instate aggressive trade policies despite challenges from the country’s highest court.
The US will impose between a 10% or 12.5% tariff on more than 80 countries, which includes the United Kingdom, Mexico, Canada, Australia, India, China, and the 27 countries that make up the European Union.
It effectively replaces the blanket 10% tariff that Trump imposed in February, right after the US supreme court declared that his many of his earlier tariffs were illegal.
“Today’s action will begin to correct what is both a human rights abuse and distortive trade practice to improve the welfare of workers everywhere,” Greer said in a statement.
“I am encouraged by the trading partners who have moved quickly to adopt forced labor import prohibitions, and look forward to ensuring their effective enforcement.”
Trump had long viewed tariffs – border taxes levied on imports – as a core tool to protect American jobs and manufacturing, reduce trade deficits and reverse what he sees as “unfair” practices by US trading partners.
Tariff, he has said many times, is “the most beautiful word in the dictionary”.
Only Congress has the authority under the constitution to levy taxes.
But last April, on what he declared was “liberation day”, Trump announced a baseline 10% tariff under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a trade law that grants the president the authority to regulate international transactions during a national emergency.
That policy, however, suffered a damaging blow in February when the US supreme court ruled 6-3 that the ability to enact tariffs during peacetime still belongs to Congress.
Trump immediately announced another 10% tariff regime under another trade law that had never been used before, which limited the tariffs to a period of 150 days.
Those tariffs will expire a minute past midnight on Friday morning.
The latest round of tariffs invoke section 301, which has long proved controversial and so far been used sparingly, according to a Brookings analysis of the law in March.
Alan Wolff, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and the former deputy director-general of the World Trade Organization, wrote in an analysis on Thursday that the latest tariffs “again raise the question of whether the president has the legal authority to determine and implement US tariff policy – an authority that the constitution vests in Congress”.
“The answer is no: Congress did not delegate authority of such breadth to the president.
It cannot constitutionally do so,” he said.
“These new tariffs would represent another case of presidential overreach.
If they were challenged in court, the supreme court would likely overturn them.”
Outside of courtroom setbacks, Trump’s tariffs have also proved unpopular among Americans, potentially presenting a threat to Republicans at the midterms this November.
A Harris Poll survey, conducted exclusively for the Guardian, found earlier this year that seven in 10 Americans said they paid higher prices because of Trump’s tariffs, and 72% of voters believe the tariffs have had a negative rather than a positive impact on consumers.
This belief persisted even among Republican voters: 64% agreed that Trump’s tariffs had led to higher prices, and 60% said tariffs have had a negative impact.
American consumers have also been pummeled by the effects of the war in the Middle East, which have sent energy costs and gas prices soaring.
The rise in energy prices has also led to a surge in inflation, which jumped to a three-year high this May.
Trump and his administration, however, are adamant that his policies have only improved the lives of American consumers.
During a heated exchange before US senators on Wednesday, Greer appeared to claim Trump’s policies had not driven prices higher.
Asked by the Democratic senator Elizabeth Warren if the tariffs had increased prices for American families, Greer said: “No.”
“Core inflation fell to 2.6% year on year, much better than in January 2025,” he added.
Core inflation excludes food and energy.
Overall inflation is slightly higher than it was when Joe Biden left office.
Speakers
2speakers16%attributed speech593writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageGreer
35 attributed words30% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.