Townhall⁠84%

Whitmer Endorses Stevens Over Socialist El-Sayed in Michigan Senate Primary ⁠74%

By Scott McClallen⁠27%

7/24/2026, 1:00:06 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 37.6% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 509 faulty-reasoning hits from 178 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 65.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (5,873 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the article peer group.

Michigan Gov. 
Gretchen Whitmer has endorsed Democrat Rep. 
Haley Stevens (MI-11) for the state’s Senate seat over socialist Abdul El-Sayed. 
Michigan voters on August 4 will decide whether Stevens or El-Sayed faces off against Republican Mike Rogers on November 3, 2026. 
Stevens is somewhat of a moderate Democrat who is supported by the establishment, while El-Sayed is a far-left Democratic Socialist who wants to enact healthcare for all, abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and give universal basic income. 
The late endorsement could push Democrat voters toward Haley over El-Sayed. 
Last weekend, Sen. 
Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Democrat Rep. 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14) held rallies in Michigan to support El-Sayed. 
Republicans hold 53 seats in the Senate while Democrats hold 45 and independents hold two seats. 
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? 
Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.3%Scott McClallen: 2.4%Townhall: 5.3%Confirmation Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Scott McClallen: 1.5%Townhall: 2.8%Availability Heuristic6.2%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.4%Townhall: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.3%Townhall: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 21.9%Scott McClallen: 7.7%Townhall: 11.2%Framing Effect21.9%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.9%Townhall: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 36.0%Scott McClallen: 8.5%Townhall: 13.5%Negativity Bias36.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.9%Townhall: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 20.8%Scott McClallen: 2.8%Townhall: 4.6%In-Group Bias20.8%This article: 20.8%Scott McClallen: 0.9%Townhall: 3.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias20.8%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.4%Townhall: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.4%Townhall: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.2%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 1.3%Recency Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.3%Townhall: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.5%Townhall: 5.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 20.8%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 2.0%Straw Man20.8%This article: 5.6%Scott McClallen: 4.2%Townhall: 4.4%Appeal to Authority5.6%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 1.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 1.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 2.3%Townhall: 9.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.6%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 1.3%Bandwagon5.6%This article: 37.6%Scott McClallen: 10.3%Townhall: 11.1%Appeal to Emotion37.6%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.1%Townhall: 2.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.2%Scott McClallen: 1.4%Townhall: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.2%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 1.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 1.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.6%Scott McClallen: 1.7%Townhall: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.6%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.2%Scott McClallen: 2.0%Townhall: 3.4%Unattributed Quote6.2%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 3.2%Townhall: 3.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 36.0%Scott McClallen: 5.5%Townhall: 16.1%Biased Writer Voice36.0%This article: 7.3%Scott McClallen: 4.0%Townhall: 5.6%Indoctrination7.3%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 20.8%Scott McClallen: 5.5%Townhall: 13.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias20.8%This article: 15.2%Scott McClallen: 3.8%Townhall: 5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…15.2%

178 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker3.4%attributed speech172writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageBernie Sanders • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bernie Sanders

0%flagged-word coverage
6 attributed words100% of attributed speech72% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-37.2 ptsWriter: 37.2%Bernie Sanders: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -21.5 ptsWriter: 21.5%Bernie Sanders: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -15.7 ptsWriter: 15.7%Bernie Sanders: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-7.6 ptsWriter: 7.6%Bernie Sanders: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-6.4 ptsWriter: 6.4%Bernie Sanders: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.