Florida’s attorney general launches criminal probe into ChatGPT over FSU shooting 58%

By MIKE SCHNEIDER0%

4/22/2026, 6:53:49 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 120 hits. Analysis detected 907 faulty-reasoning hits from 641 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.4% and a BS Rank of 58% (9,338 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the article peer group.

By MIKE SCHNEIDER 
Updated 2:02 PM PDT, April 21, 2026 
ORLANDO, Fla. 
(AP)  Florida’s attorney general on Tuesday opened a rare criminal investigation into OpenAI’s ChatGPT over whether the artificial intelligence app offered advice to a gunman who killed two people and wounded six others last year at Florida State University. 
Attorney General James Uthmeier said that prosecutors had done an initial review of chat logs between ChatGPT and the gunman, Phoenix Ikner, to determine if the AI app aided, abetted or advised the commission of a crime. 
Prosecutors believe the chatbot advised Ikner on what type of gun and ammunition to use, whether a gun would be useful at short range, and what time of day and at which location would allow for the most potential victims, Uthmeier said. 
“My prosecutors have looked at this, and they’ve told me if it was a person at the other end of that screen, we would be charging them with murder,” Uthmeier said at a news conference in Tampa. 
“Now, of course, ChatGPT is not a person, but that does not absolve our office and my prosecution team from our duty to investigate whether there is criminal culpability here.” 
Florida’s Office of Statewide Prosecution has subpoenaed OpenAI for records of its policies and training materials regarding threats to harm others, and for its policies on reporting “possible past, present, or future crime,” according to the attorney general’s office. 
OpenAI spokeswoman Kate Waters called the FSU shooting a tragedy but said the company had no responsibility. 
The company proactively shared information with law enforcement and continues to cooperate with investigators, she said Tuesday. 
“In this case, ChatGPT provided factual responses to questions with information that could be found broadly across public sources on the internet, and it did not encourage or promote illegal or harmful activity,” Waters said in an email. 
Uthmeier conceded that his office was venturing into “uncharted territory” by launching a criminal probe into whether a chatbot contributed to the commission of a crime. 
His office also has initiated a civil probe, he said. 
Several civil lawsuits have sought damages from AI and tech companies over the influence of chatbots and social media on loved ones’ mental health. 
Last month, a jury in Los Angeles found both Meta and YouTube liable for harms to children using their services. 
In New Mexico, a jury determined that Meta knowingly harmed children’s mental health and concealed what it knew about child sexual exploitation on its platforms. 
Also last month, a man sued Google for the wrongful death by suicide of his son and product liability claims, the latest in a growing number of legal challenges against AI developers that have drawn attention to the mental health dangers of chatbot companionship. 
Ikner faces two counts of first-degree murder and several counts of attempted first-degree murder in the shooting that terrorized the campus in Florida’s capital city. 
Ikner is the stepson of a local sheriff’s deputy, and investigators say he used his stepmother’s former service weapon to carry out the shooting. 
Prosecutors in the case intend to seek the death penalty. 
Uthmeier, a Republican, was named to the position by Florida Gov. 
Ron DeSantis, after the GOP governor appointed then-Attorney General Ashley Moody to the U.S. 
Senate seat vacated by Marco Rubio when he became the secretary of state in President Donald Trump’s second administration. 
Uthmeier is running in November to be elected to the position on his own. 
DeSantis has called a special session for the end of the month to consider an “Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights,” as well as redraw congressional districts. 
Charles Sheehan in New York contributed to this report. 
MIKE SCHNEIDER 
Schneider covers census, demographics and Florida for The Associated Press. 
Author of 2023 book, “Mickey and the Teamsters.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.5%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias12.5%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.6%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic10.6%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect10.3%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 18.7%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias18.7%This article: 4.8%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 14.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias14.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.2%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority1.2%This article: 5.8%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma5.8%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.9%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization13.9%This article: 4.1%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring4.1%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.9%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion3.9%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.6%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal10.6%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.9%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.9%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 4.7%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading4.7%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.6%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote6.6%This article: 5.8%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection5.8%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 4.7%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination4.7%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%MIKE SCHNEIDER: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

641 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers46%attributed speech348writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageJames Uthmeier • 37 words • 0.0% coverageJames Uthmeier • 42 words • 100.0% coverageJames Uthmeier • 37 words • 100.0% coverageJames Uthmeier • 30 words • 100.0% coverageOffice of Statewide Prosecution • 39 words • 0.0% coverageKate Waters • 17 words • 0.0% coverageKate Waters • 17 words • 0.0% coverageKate Waters • 38 words • 0.0% coverageJames Uthmeier • 26 words • 0.0% coverageJames Uthmeier • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

James Uthmeier

74%flagged-word coverage
182 attributed words62% of attributed speech71% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Unattributed Quote+23.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%James Uthmeier: 23.1%23.1%Quote-first Misdirection+20.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%James Uthmeier: 20.3%20.3%Indoctrination+16.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%James Uthmeier: 16.5%16.5%Politically Right Leaning -3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%James Uthmeier: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.