nola.com29%

WR Chris Olave, Saints reach agreement on a big time four-year contract extension 12%

By Matthew Paras46%

7/30/2026, 1:54:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 786 faulty-reasoning hits from 517 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22.4% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,150 of 28,464 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the article peer group.

Chris Olave's holdout is over. 
And the New Orleans Saints wide receiver is set to be a lot richer after it. 
Olave and the Saints have agreed on a four-year contract worth up to $132 million that includes $90 million guaranteed, sources with knowledge of the situation said. 
A $33 million per year average, first reported by ESPN, would make Olave the sixth-highest-paid receiver in the NFL in terms of average annual value. 
The contract was reached two days after Olave withheld himself from team drills during training camp to avoid a major injury. 
Now that the contract is settled, Olave will likely resume being a full participant in practice. 
Last season, Olave bounced back with a career year (1,163 yards on 100 catches for nine touchdowns) after he previously contemplated retiring due to concussion issues that sidelined him for most of the 2024 season. 
The campaign earned Olave his first All-Pro honor and he was voted as the league’s 64th best player in the NFL’s top 100. 
“I’ve played four years already and I’ve produced at a high level,” Olave said in May. 
“I feel like it’s kind of that time to be able to come to the table, especially after this year. 
It’s really in their hands. 
I told them I want to be here for a long time, and they know that.” 
But the Saints still wanted to get a deal done. 
And the longer they had waited, the chances were the price tag would have gone up. 
Seattle’s Jaxon Smith-Njigba (four years, $168.6 million) and Atlanta’s Drake London (four years, $141 million) were among those at wide receiver to sign substantial new contracts in recent months. 
Olave is set to become the 12th wideout to sign a contract worth at least $30 million per year. 
His practical guarantees of $90 million, according to Spotrac, would be tied for sixth  falling in line with the Jets’ Garrett Wilson, who was drafted one pick before Olave but signed his deal one year earlier. 
Olave’s contract reflects the latest way the Saints have valued their star wideout. 
On draft night, the team sent a package of draft picks to the Washington Commanders so they could move up from No. 16 to No. 
11. 
They were enticed by Olave’s game-changing speed, smooth route running and versatility  all of which have translated to the pros. 
And they’ve never stopped believing in him. 
Last November, the Saints resisted dealing Olave at the league’s trade deadline amid the team’s 1-8 start. 
Back then, the Saints shipped Rashid Shaheed to the Seattle Seahawks and released Brandin Cooks. 
But they held on to Olave, hopeful that they could extend him down the road. 
Olave has been grateful for the support. 
After beating the Panthers last December, when he first admitted he considered retiring, Olave said he “couldn’t thank the organization enough” for standing by him and being patient while dealing with his head injuries. 
“They’ve been nothing but good to me,” Olave said then. 
That continued Thursday. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.1%Matthew Paras: 1.6%nola.com: 1.9%Confirmation Bias4.1%This article: 3.1%Matthew Paras: 1.4%nola.com: 0.8%Anchoring Bias3.1%This article: 18.0%Matthew Paras: 2.1%nola.com: 2.0%Availability Heuristic18.0%This article: 4.8%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic4.8%This article: 2.9%Matthew Paras: 1.9%nola.com: 0.5%Hindsight Bias2.9%This article: 3.1%Matthew Paras: 0.3%nola.com: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias3.1%This article: 3.1%Matthew Paras: 3.7%nola.com: 3.3%Framing Effect3.1%This article: 3.1%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.5%Loss Aversion3.1%This article: 3.7%Matthew Paras: 0.2%nola.com: 0.4%Status Quo Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.1%Matthew Paras: 3.4%nola.com: 3.7%Optimism Bias9.1%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Matthew Paras: 5.2%nola.com: 3.3%Negativity Bias1.4%This article: 12.8%Matthew Paras: 0.7%nola.com: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias12.8%This article: 4.4%Matthew Paras: 0.8%nola.com: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error4.4%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.3%nola.com: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 15.7%Matthew Paras: 4.9%nola.com: 2.4%Halo Effect15.7%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.6%Matthew Paras: 2.8%nola.com: 0.9%Recency Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.5%nola.com: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.4%nola.com: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.4%Matthew Paras: 0.7%nola.com: 2.2%Appeal to Authority12.4%This article: 3.1%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.8%False Dilemma3.1%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.4%nola.com: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.3%Matthew Paras: 1.7%nola.com: 2.2%Hasty Generalization9.3%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.6%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.4%Bandwagon5.6%This article: 10.6%Matthew Paras: 0.4%nola.com: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion10.6%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.1%Matthew Paras: 2.2%nola.com: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.1%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.8%Matthew Paras: 0.4%nola.com: 0.3%Composition/Division4.8%This article: 1.4%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 1.8%Anecdotal1.4%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.4%nola.com: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.5%nola.com: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.0%Matthew Paras: 1.4%nola.com: 1.4%Unattributed Quote1.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.7%nola.com: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.8%nola.com: 2.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Paras: 0.1%nola.com: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

517 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker20%attributed speech416writer words
Selected voice

Olave

90%flagged-word coverage
101 attributed words100% of attributed speech87% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Unattributed Quote+5.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Olave: 5.0%5.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.