Grist28%

New York governor orders first statewide data center moratorium 19%

By Alex Brown29% Stateline26%

7/18/2026, 1:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 459 faulty-reasoning hits from 391 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34% and a BS Rank of 19% (16,731 of 20,516 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 81.60% of the article peer group.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, issued an executive order Tuesday that puts a moratorium on the construction of large-scale data centers. 
The pause, which will last up to a year, is the nation’s first statewide ban on data centers, which have drawn increasing concern from lawmakers and citizens based on their impact on electricity prices and the energy grid. 
“As data center development threatens to hike up utility bills, deplete our natural resources, and create uncertainty for New Yorkers, it’s my responsibility to take action and lead,” Hochul said in a statement . 
Technology companies have invested billions of dollars to build data centers all across the country, driven in part by the computing demands from artificial intelligence. 
In her executive order, Hochul directed the state Department of Public Service to issue no new permits for large-scale data centers for a year. 
During that period, the agency will conduct an environmental analysis on the impacts of data centers, along with a proceeding to “require data centers to either pay more for their energy or supply their own.” 
New York lawmakers passed a more extensive data center moratorium last month, but Hochul has not said whether she will sign the bill. 
Climate activists take on a new foe: Data centers 
Maine Governor Janet Mills, also a Democrat, vetoed a measure earlier this year that would have been the first statewide data center ban. 
In a news release, Hochul also directed the state’s economic development agency to develop a framework that local communities can use to negotiate with tech companies that seek to construct data centers. 
That framework will focus on infrastructure improvements, child care investments, direct financial support, and labor and wage standards. 
She also announced plans for a fund that would require data centers to invest in New York’s grid infrastructure and clean energy supply. 
And she called on lawmakers to repeal the state’s sales tax exemptions for large data centers. 
Across the country, data centers have drawn vocal opposition at local public meetings and in state capitols. 
Several cities and counties will vote on ballot measures this year to restrict the development of new data centers. 
This story was originally published by Grist with the headline New York governor orders first statewide data center moratorium on Jul 18, 2026. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 14.1%Alex Brown: 9.4%Grist: 3.0%Availability Heuristic14.1%This article: 6.4%Alex Brown: 2.1%Grist: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic6.4%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Alex Brown: 9.5%Grist: 5.0%Framing Effect6.4%This article: 8.7%Alex Brown: 8.7%Grist: 0.7%Loss Aversion8.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 3.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 16.4%Alex Brown: 9.1%Grist: 7.0%Negativity Bias16.4%This article: 8.7%Alex Brown: 2.9%Grist: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias8.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Alex Brown: 2.0%Grist: 0.8%In-Group Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 1.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.9%Alex Brown: 2.0%Grist: 1.2%Recency Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 4.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 3.0%Grist: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.7%Alex Brown: 3.2%Grist: 4.0%Hasty Generalization9.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.9%Alex Brown: 3.2%Grist: 0.6%Bandwagon4.9%This article: 11.0%Alex Brown: 9.5%Grist: 4.0%Appeal to Emotion11.0%This article: 8.7%Alex Brown: 2.9%Grist: 0.7%Begging the Question8.7%This article: 6.4%Alex Brown: 2.1%Grist: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.4%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.3%Alex Brown: 1.4%Grist: 2.1%Anecdotal4.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.8%Grist: 2.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.8%Grist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Brown: 0.0%Grist: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

391 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers42%attributed speech227writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 24 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Public Service • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 23 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kathy Hochul

39%flagged-word coverage
129 attributed words79% of attributed speech68% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.