KUER0%

The Utah Renewable Communities energy program is almost ready for launch 40%

By Macy Lipkin0%

4/6/2026, 8:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,142 faulty-reasoning hits from 653 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.2% and a BS Rank of 40% (13,150 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the article peer group.

It’s go time for a new renewable energy program in Utah. 
Nineteen cities, towns and counties will soon decide whether to join Utah Renewable Communities. 
If they do, it’ll then be up to residents to choose whether to pay $4 a month to support new renewable energy resources like solar or wind farms. 
The goal is to net 100% renewable for participating customers, said Glade Sowards, senior energy and climate program manager for Salt Lake City. 
In other words, the program aims to generate as much renewable energy as people use from non-renewable sources. 
The Utah Public Services Commission approved the program in March, and cities have until June 2 to adopt an ordinance to join. 
The $4 monthly fee for residential customers will start in early 2027, but will vary by usage for businesses. 
Customers in participating communities will be signed up automatically, but can opt out for free in the first six months. 
After that, there will be a charge to leave the program. 
Twelve cents of that $4 will subsidize low-income participants of Rocky Mountain Power’s Home Electric Lifeline Program, who will receive a credit on their bill to cover the monthly fee. 
Initially, the money will cover the program’s start-up costs with Rocky Mountain Power. 
After that, it will support new renewable energy, Sowards said. 
Utah Renewable Communities is still considering bids for new clean energy resources in Utah, Wyoming or Idaho. 
Sowards estimates they’ll be built between 2027 and 2029. 
“We want to kind of see what the participation levels look like, and that'll help inform, you know, how many resources to acquire going forward,” he said. 
The 19 participating communities represent about a quarter of Rocky Mountain Power’s sales in Utah and roughly 20% of total electricity sales in Utah, Sowards said. 
He sees $4 as a reasonable price to shift a large chunk of Utah customers to renewable energy. 
“I think I've probably picked up a latte that cost that much before,” he said. 
The relatively low cost is one reason why the volunteers on Ogden’s Sustainability Committee are recommending the city join the program, said Lorenzo Long, the city’s sustainability coordinator. 
“They felt that this program, due to its uncomplicated and affordable path to net 100% renewable electricity, and its voluntary nature  the fact that you can opt out  they felt that that made it a very good fit for Ogden,” he said. 
Participating in Utah Renewable Communities is much cheaper than installing solar panels, making it a new option for residents. 
“It lets them choose a path that they don't have currently,” he said. 
Logan Mitchell, a climate scientist and energy analyst with Utah Clean Energy, said the program is unlikely to make much of a difference in Utah’s air quality. 
That’s because there aren’t many power plants along the Wasatch Front. 
“It doesn't have a strong local air quality benefit, but it has a really important greenhouse gas emission reduction benefit,” Mitchell said. 
PacifiCorp, the parent company of Rocky Mountain Power, expects to get about 45% of its electricity from renewable sources in 2027. 
That includes Oregon and Washington, which require utilities to meet certain clean energy thresholds. 
PacifiCorp has no new wind or solar projects planned for Utah customers through 2045, according to its latest integrated resource plan. 
That’s why Mitchell said Utah Renewable Communities stands to make a difference. 
“This program is a concrete way to actually build new clean energy resources for serving Utah customers,” Mitchell said. 
“So it's really important for that reason.” 
The Ogden City Council will discuss the program at its April 7 work session. 
A formal vote will follow, likely in May. 
The topic is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing in Salt Lake City April 21. 
Macy Lipkin is a Report for America corps member who reports for KUER in northern Utah. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.9%Macy Lipkin: 2.4%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias12.9%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 2.0%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Macy Lipkin: 4.3%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic4.3%This article: 4.0%Macy Lipkin: 1.0%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic4.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Macy Lipkin: 1.6%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias1.4%This article: 7.2%Macy Lipkin: 5.8%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect7.2%This article: 3.1%Macy Lipkin: 1.4%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion3.1%This article: 2.8%Macy Lipkin: 1.2%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias2.8%This article: 2.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.4%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect2.0%This article: 11.5%Macy Lipkin: 5.1%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias11.5%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 2.1%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Macy Lipkin: 5.6%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 1.6%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.8%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Macy Lipkin: 1.2%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect6.1%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.2%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias1.2%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 23.0%Macy Lipkin: 4.6%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority23.0%This article: 3.4%Macy Lipkin: 1.5%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma3.4%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.7%Macy Lipkin: 3.6%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization5.7%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.7%Macy Lipkin: 0.4%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon6.7%This article: 4.3%Macy Lipkin: 4.6%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion4.3%This article: 7.7%Macy Lipkin: 0.6%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question7.7%This article: 7.5%Macy Lipkin: 2.2%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.5%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.4%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.6%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division4.6%This article: 2.3%Macy Lipkin: 3.9%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal2.3%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.3%Macy Lipkin: 1.7%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.3%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.8%KUER: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.4%Macy Lipkin: 1.4%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice3.4%This article: 4.3%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.6%Indoctrination4.3%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.5%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 30.6%Macy Lipkin: 0.7%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…30.6%

653 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers59%attributed speech270writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageGlade Sowards • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageUtah Public Services Commission • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageGlade Sowards • 10 words • 0.0% coverageUtah Renewable Communities • 17 words • 0.0% coverageGlade Sowards • 9 words • 100.0% coverageGlade Sowards • 27 words • 0.0% coverageGlade Sowards • 26 words • 0.0% coverageGlade Sowards • 18 words • 100.0% coverageGlade Sowards • 15 words • 0.0% coverageLorenzo Long • 28 words • 100.0% coverageLorenzo Long • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageLorenzo Long • 13 words • 100.0% coverageLogan Mitchell • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageLogan Mitchell • 22 words • 0.0% coveragePacifiCorp • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coveragePacifiCorp • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageLogan Mitchell • 19 words • 100.0% coverageLogan Mitchell • 7 words • 0.0% coverageOgden City Council • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lorenzo Long

100%flagged-word coverage
85 attributed words22% of attributed speech71% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +74.4 ptsWriter: 25.6%Lorenzo Long: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-10.4 ptsWriter: 10.4%Lorenzo Long: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.1 ptsWriter: 8.1%Lorenzo Long: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.