Wonkette⁠93%

Hey Granddad You're In Jail. Wonkette One-A-Day for 7/30/26 ⁠10%

By Rebecca Schoenkopf⁠87%

7/30/2026, 4:31:20 PM

Topics: Commentary

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Sunk Cost Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 436 faulty-reasoning hits from 186 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 20.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (25,309 of 28,038 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the article peer group.

Hi hi hi hi hi. 
We may or may not have (definitely did) skipped some One-A-Days for you since I’ve been back from vacation. 
So here’s today’s! 
Sure fuck it subscribe why not? 
Here were tabs! 
They were good tabs! 
They included these important announcements. 
WONKMEETS AHOY. 
CLEVELAND (Aug. 
8), PITTSBURGH (Aug. 
9), SAN FRANCISCO IN HONOR OF FUKUI (Aug. 
21), WINDSOR, MASS (camp near but not at Paul and Holly’s, Labor Day weekend)! 
Atlanta has been postponed. 
TIME TO PARTY! 
There will be info on Cleveland’s wonkmeet in tomorrow’s tabs. 
You should probably read tomorrow’s tabs! 
Evan watched the Fauci hearings. 
It was actually really upsetting, watching their hard-on to throw him in jail :/ 
Okay. 
No reason, just noting that there’s still plenty of cocaine around, why do you ask? 
MMHMMM. 
I learned a lot of things reading Robyn. 
Very very stupid things. 
And I’ll give you one from yesterday since I didn’t do a One-a-Day for what I’m sure was an excellent reason (AND IT WAS). 
See you bright and early for tabs! :D 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.1%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.5%Wonkette: 5.5%Confirmation Bias8.1%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.4%Wonkette: 2.0%Availability Heuristic8.1%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.3%Wonkette: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.2%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.6%Wonkette: 0.7%Hindsight Bias2.2%This article: 12.9%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias12.9%This article: 2.7%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.4%Wonkette: 4.0%Framing Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.8%Wonkette: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.3%Wonkette: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 23.1%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect23.1%This article: 4.8%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.2%Wonkette: 0.8%Optimism Bias4.8%This article: 10.2%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.2%Wonkette: 1.5%Pessimism Bias10.2%This article: 22.6%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 17.6%Wonkette: 15.7%Negativity Bias22.6%This article: 12.9%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.9%Wonkette: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias12.9%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.3%Wonkette: 2.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.2%Wonkette: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.3%Wonkette: 1.4%In-Group Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.3%Wonkette: 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.2%Wonkette: 0.5%Halo Effect2.2%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.8%Wonkette: 1.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.2%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.6%Wonkette: 0.8%Recency Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.8%Wonkette: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 5.8%Wonkette: 11.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.1%Wonkette: 2.8%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 1.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.6%Wonkette: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.7%Wonkette: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.0%Wonkette: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.2%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 7.0%Wonkette: 7.9%Hasty Generalization2.2%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.1%Wonkette: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.2%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.3%Wonkette: 0.4%Bandwagon3.2%This article: 12.4%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 6.0%Wonkette: 7.2%Appeal to Emotion12.4%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.6%Wonkette: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.4%Wonkette: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.3%Wonkette: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.1%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.3%Wonkette: 0.7%Burden of Proof8.1%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.3%Wonkette: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 12.4%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.6%Wonkette: 2.0%Anecdotal12.4%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 25.3%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.6%Wonkette: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)25.3%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.1%Wonkette: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 12.9%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.3%Wonkette: 0.2%Special Pleading12.9%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.3%Wonkette: 1.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.1%Wonkette: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 25.3%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 32.6%Wonkette: 30.9%Biased Writer Voice25.3%This article: 3.2%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.4%Wonkette: 2.2%Indoctrination3.2%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 10.3%Wonkette: 10.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.5%Wonkette: 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 13.4%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 12.1%Wonkette: 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…13.4%

186 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.