Texas becomes first state to include Bible stories as required reading in schools 26%

By OAN Staff Katherine Mosack0%

6/27/2026, 10:37:12 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Indoctrination, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.5% saturation with 174 hits. Analysis detected 856 faulty-reasoning hits from 571 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (16,337 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the article peer group.

For the first time, the Texas Board of Education has approved a statewide mandatory reading list that includes Bible stories, affecting about 5.5 million public school students. 
10 of the school board’s 15 members are Republican. 
In 2025, Texas also passed a bill requiring public schools to display the Ten Commandments in classrooms. 
Despite legal pushback, the measure was ultimately upheld by a Fifth Circuit court. 
Some argue that the new list is unconstitutional, citing the landmark 1962 Supreme Court Case Engel v. 
Vitale and the general notion of the separation of church and state. 
In Engel v. 
Vitale, the court ruled that mandatory, school-sponsored prayer violated the government’s prohibition of establishing an official state religion outlined in the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. 
Meanwhile, the separation of church and state, though derived from the Establishment Clause, does not appear in the U.S. 
Constitution. 
Instead, President Thomas Jefferson wrote in a letter that the First Amendment built “a wall of separation between church & state,” though he advocated for the Christian faith throughout his life in public service, even attending worship services at the Capitol building as Vice President and President. 
However, Texas has legal precedent behind the changes made to its curriculum. 
The 1963 Supreme Court case of Abington School District v. 
Schempp allows for teaching biblical or religious texts from a nonreligious standpoint. 
“It certainly may be said that the Bible is worthy of study for its literary and historic qualities,” the majority decision reads. 
“Nothing we have said here indicates that such study of the Bible or of religion, when presented objectively as part of a secular program of education, may not be effected consistently with the First Amendment.” 
Kindergarteners will still be reading classics such as “Anansi the Spider: A Tale from the Ashanti” by Gerald McDermott, “Blueberries for Sal” by Robert McCloskey and “The Cat in the Hat” by Dr. 
Seuss, and are not required to read Biblical texts, according to the Texas Education Agency (TEA)’s newly approved literary works list. 
Second-, fourth-, and fifth-graders also do not have required Bible passages. 
They will still read stories such as “Johnny Appleseed” by Steven Kellogg, “Robinhood and the Golden Arrow” by William J. 
Bennett and “The Phantom Tollbooth” by Norton Juster. 
The new reading list features a variety of materials for other grade levels, including, but not limited to: 
First Grade 
* “The Tale of Peter Rabbit” by Beatrix Potter 
* The Parable of the Prodigal Son 
Third Grade 
* “Charlotte’s Web” by E. 
B. 
White 
* The Road to Damascus 
Sixth Grade 
* The Gettysburg Address by President Abraham Lincoln 
* Matthew 6:25-34 English Standard Version (ESV) 
Seventh Grade 
* “A Wrinkle in Time” by Madeleine L’Engle 
* Jonah New International Reader’s Version (NIRV) 
* Psalm 23 King James Version (KJV) 
* 1 Corinthians 13 ESV 
Eighth Grade 
* “What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?” 
by Frederick Douglass 
* Matthew 5:1-12 KJV 
Ninth Grade 
* “Animal Farm” by George Orwell 
* 1 Samuel 17 NIRV 
Tenth Grade 
* “Frankenstein” by Mary Shelley 
* Genesis 11:1-9 NIRV 
Eleventh Grade 
* “The Great Gatsby” by F. 
Scott Fitzgerald 
* Ecclesiastes 3 KJV 
Twelfth Grade 
* “Hamlet” by William Shakespeare 
* Job chapters 1-7, 11, 14, 19, 18, 38-42 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 2.8%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias11.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.9%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 3.2%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic4.7%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 4.3%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias2.1%This article: 30.5%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 9.7%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect30.5%This article: 9.3%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion9.3%This article: 3.7%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.9%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 4.4%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 1.1%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 6.5%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias4.6%This article: 8.2%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 3.2%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias8.2%This article: 1.6%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error1.6%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 4.6%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 6.5%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.9%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect1.8%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 2.4%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 27.1%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 4.6%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority27.1%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.1%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 5.0%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization2.1%This article: 3.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring3.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.4%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 11.2%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion0.4%This article: 2.1%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question2.1%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 1.7%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 1.8%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.4%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 2.0%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.4%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.1%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 2.3%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote6.1%This article: 3.9%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 2.3%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection3.9%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 6.0%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 11.2%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 2.6%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination11.2%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 7.1%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 2.2%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.6%

571 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers12%attributed speech500writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Jefferson • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageTexas Education Agency (TEA) • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageFrederick Douglass • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Thomas Jefferson

100%flagged-word coverage
47 attributed words66% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Indoctrination-12.8 ptsWriter: 12.8%Thomas Jefferson: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-7.0 ptsWriter: 7.0%Thomas Jefferson: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.4 ptsWriter: 4.4%Thomas Jefferson: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%Thomas Jefferson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.