Washington woman accused of chasing kid on dirt bike down sidewalk in her car while under the influence 3%

By Jasmine Fernández0%

5/5/2026, 4:07:45 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 2 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 90 faulty-reasoning hits from 495 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 14.7% and a BS Rank of 3% (21,323 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 97.40% of the article peer group.

A Spokane woman faces felony assault and DUI charges after police released video appearing to show a driver chasing a child on a dirt bike across residential sidewalks in Cheney, Washington. 
The video, released Monday by the Spokane County Sheriff’s Office, shows a silver Ford Focus apparently pursuing the child along the 7500 block of South Fruitvale Road at approximately 6:05 p.m. on April 28. 
In the video, the vehicle appear to narrowly miss a fire hydrant and several bushes as it drives over curbs and across lawns in what deputies described as an attempt to hit the child. 
Neighbors are seen attempting to intervene and recording the incident on their phones before the driver appears to veer back onto the roadway and leaves the area. 
Prior to the alleged chase, the child is seen maneuvering away from the car. 
The driver, identified by officials as 56-year-old Wendy A. 
Clemente, is accused of stopping the vehicle to yell at the child. 
The child appeared to respond before turning away, at which point the driver appears to start the pursuit. 
The child was not hit or injured during the encounter. 
At approximately 6:30 p.m., while deputies were at the first scene, they were notified of a reported residential burglary about a mile away on West Melville Road, according to police. 
A homeowner who was not at the residence told authorities they had been watching a suspect on a live security system trying door handles. 
Deputies arrived at the second location and found Clemente and the silver Ford Focus parked in the victim’s driveway, police said in a written statement. 
Clemente was advised of her rights and agreed to answer questions, police said. 
She said she “took her dog for a ride” and was “looking for other dogs to socialize with,” according to police. 
It’s alleged she told deputies she had stopped at the property because she saw dogs in a fenced yard, though she admitted she did not know the homeowner. 
Clemente is also accused of telling police she did not remember any incident on South Fruitvale Road and denied attempting to enter the residence on West Melville Road. 
Deputies said Clemente showed signs of impairment. 
She initially denied consuming any substances but later said she had been drinking alcohol, according to a police statement. 
Investigators were granted a search warrant to obtain a sample of Clemente’s blood for testing. 
She was booked into the Spokane County Jail on charges of first-degree attempted assault, DUI and first-degree criminal trespass. 
The following day, Spokane County Superior Court Commissioner N. 
Swennumson ordered that Clemente be released on her own recognizance without needing to post bond. 
No injuries were reported as a result of the alleged incidents. 
The Independent has reached out to the Spokane County Sheriff's Office for more information. 
It is not clear if Clemente has obtained legal representation. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.5%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.5%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 3.3%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.5%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.2%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.1%The Independent: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 6.4%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.9%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.6%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.2%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.8%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.8%The Independent: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 9.2%The Independent: 12.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.0%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Jasmine Fernández: 0.3%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error1.4%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.3%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.1%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.3%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 3.4%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.3%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.5%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.5%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 4.7%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.4%The Independent: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.1%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.3%The Independent: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.4%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 4.3%The Independent: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.5%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.9%The Independent: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.3%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.3%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.2%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.6%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.7%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 1.7%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 2.2%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 16.8%Jasmine Fernández: 2.7%The Independent: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice16.8%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 2.3%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.9%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.3%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Fernández: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

495 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker19%attributed speech399writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWendy A. Clemente • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWendy A. Clemente • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWendy A. Clemente • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWendy A. Clemente • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Wendy A. Clemente

0%flagged-word coverage
96 attributed words100% of attributed speech23% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-20.8 ptsWriter: 20.8%Wendy A. Clemente: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.