Washington fire updates: Firefighters gain ground on 3 blazes near Spokane, but threat remains 18%

By Jack Brewster32% Jasmine Andersson26% Mike Bebernes31%

8/2/2026, 8:22:38 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 787 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,098 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25.6% and a BS Rank of 18% (25,283 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the article peer group.

Firefighters have made progress containing all three of the devastating wildfires near Spokane, Wash., but the blazes, which have collectively destroyed hundreds of homes and forced thousands to evacuate, still pose a significant danger to the community, authorities said Wednesday morning. 
A man was arrested on Monday on suspicion of setting one of the fires. 
Aaron F. 
Farinacci, 37, of Spokane, was booked on suspicion of first-degree arson in connection with the Old Trails Fire, the second largest of the blazes, the Spokane County Sheriff's Office said. 
He is expected to enter a plea in court on Thursday, according to news outlets. 
Farinacci had waterproof matches and a butane lighter when he was detained, Spokane County Sheriff John Nowels said at a press conference on Monday. 
Nowels credited local residents with helping authorities identify the suspect 
"As it happens in so many critical cases, it was citizens who were paying attention to their surroundings, being aware and willing to step up and say something that led to the relatively quick apprehension of Mr. 
Farinacci," he said. 
Officials have not said what may have caused the other two fires. 
A statewide emergency was declared on Saturday. 
More than 67,000 people had been ordered to evacuate as of Tuesday, with the first orders issued Friday afternoon. 
Spokane Mayor Lisa Brown called it "the worst natural disaster our region has faced." 
Around 3,000 homes are still without power, according to data from utility company Avista on Tuesday afternoon. 
None of the three wildfires had been contained as of Tuesday afternoon, according to the Western Fire Chiefs Association. 
The county initially received nearly 300 reports of missing people, but later cleared all but 14. 
What's burning? 
According to authorities, the Old Trails Fire in northwest Spokane had burned about 3,600 acres and was 13% contained as of Wednesday morning, KREM 2 reported. 
The nearby Autumn Lane Fire had consumed more than 5,800 acres and was also 13% contained. 
The smallest of the three blazes near Spokane, the Fairview Fire, had burned just over 1,000 acres and was 5% contained. 
"Hundreds of people have completely lost their homes and farms, and many are prohibited from returning to their homes or neighborhoods as crews continue to extinguish smoldering embers," the state's congressional delegation wrote Monday when asking President Donald Trump to approve an expedited emergency declaration. 
In a press conference Tuesday morning, Tom Clemo of the California Interagency Incident Management Team 7 said upwards of 700 structures had been lost over the last 48 hours as a result of the fire. 
The fires near Spokane are three of a total of 13 major wildfires burning across the state of Washington. 
The largest of the blazes, the Kaiser Canyon Fire, has burned more than 136,000 acres, but it's not located near a major population center. 
So far in 2026, Washington has dealt with more than 600 wildfires, which have burned a total of 336,000 acres. 
"This year has already been one of our busiest wildfire years on record, and we just started August," Public Lands Commissioner Dave Upthegrove said. 
Some Spokane residents have returned to find their homes leveled by wildfires that erupted across a parched landscape over the weekend, covering yards in charred debris. 
In some cases, only chimneys were left standing. 
"There's nothing to save," Miriam Sim, 76, said Monday as she and her husband, Daniel Sim, surveyed the ruins of the home where they had lived since 2005. 
"At our age, do we want to rebuild?" 
her husband asked. 
Karen Faggioli, 61, told the Associated Press that she figured she would be returning to her home, but a relative told her that her house and three vehicles were destroyed. 
"Why cry? 
What's crying going to do? 
I've been through so many tragedies myself," said Faggioli, who is recovering from breast cancer. 
"This is nothing. 
Like I told my granddaughter, 'We're strong  and now we get all new things.' 
I'm emotionally numb." 
According to the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) burn ban map, fire restrictions are in effect across much of Washington state. 
Burn bans cover most counties in western and central Washington and extend into several counties in the east, indicating that restrictions have been implemented across a broad geographic area. 
*Weather changes fast. 
Get real-time alerts for your area on the new Yahoo Weather app. 
* 
Why they spread so fast 
Forecasters had warned for days that conditions were primed for disaster. 
The National Weather Service issued a "Particularly Dangerous Situation" fire-weather warning for central and eastern Washington for the duration of Saturday, a rare step reserved for the most extreme conditions. 
The Spokesman-Review reported it was the first such warning ever issued for eastern Washington. 
The trigger was a combination of extreme heat, low humidity and wind gusts of 35 to 45 mph, on top of Washington's fourth straight year of statewide drought. 
When the Old Trails Fire started near Airway Heights around noon Saturday, the wind drove it into Riverside State Park and then across the Spokane River into the city's neighborhoods within hours. 
The damage and evacuations 
Authorities in Spokane issued evacuation orders on Saturday and Sunday, emptying much of the city's northwest. 
Many of those evacuation orders remained in place on Wednesday morning. 
Spokane County Commissioner Chris Jordan said on Sunday relatives of his were in an area affected by the fires and didn't know if their home was still standing. 
He said he spoke with them as they were leaving the home. 
"They're in their car and all they can see is smoke everywhere, and it was incredibly scary for so many people," he said during a news conference. 
The evacuation footprint has shrunk, with the remaining Level 2 and Level 3 zones  seen in yellow and red  more tightly concentrated around the Old Trails Fire near Country Homes and Riverside State Park. 
What's next 
More than 1,000 firefighters, many from out of state, had arrived by Monday to tackle the blazes. 
That number is expected to double in the next few days. 
Calmer winds and lower temperatures have helped firefighters, but it is expected that it will become hot and dry again by midweek. 
The National Weather Service forecast for Wednesday indicated warm and dry conditions in Spokane, with a high of approximately 92°F. 
Hazy skies are expected due to smoke from ongoing wildfires, resulting in poor air quality, while the lack of precipitation and continued dry conditions are expected to contribute to ongoing wildfire concerns. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.7%Jack Brewster: 1.3%Associated Press: 2.1%Confirmation Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.8%Associated Press: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Jack Brewster: 4.4%Associated Press: 2.6%Availability Heuristic3.6%This article: 1.7%Jack Brewster: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic1.7%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.7%Associated Press: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Jack Brewster: 2.9%Associated Press: 4.8%Framing Effect2.6%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.0%Jack Brewster: 1.4%Associated Press: 1.5%Optimism Bias1.0%This article: 7.1%Jack Brewster: 1.5%Associated Press: 1.1%Pessimism Bias7.1%This article: 13.8%Jack Brewster: 4.3%Associated Press: 6.6%Negativity Bias13.8%This article: 0.2%Jack Brewster: 0.1%Associated Press: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.2%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.3%Jack Brewster: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.3%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.3%Jack Brewster: 1.8%Associated Press: 2.8%Halo Effect0.3%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.5%Jack Brewster: 0.8%Associated Press: 1.2%Recency Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.7%Jack Brewster: 4.3%Associated Press: 3.2%Appeal to Authority2.7%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.5%Jack Brewster: 1.3%Associated Press: 2.8%Hasty Generalization1.5%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.7%Jack Brewster: 2.5%Associated Press: 4.0%Appeal to Emotion6.7%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.5%Jack Brewster: 1.4%Associated Press: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.5%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.6%Jack Brewster: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.2%Composition/Division2.6%This article: 7.4%Jack Brewster: 1.4%Associated Press: 1.6%Anecdotal7.4%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.5%Jack Brewster: 0.6%Associated Press: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.5%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.4%Jack Brewster: 0.8%Associated Press: 1.6%Unattributed Quote3.4%This article: 3.4%Jack Brewster: 0.9%Associated Press: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection3.4%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 1.7%Associated Press: 4.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.3%Jack Brewster: 2.3%Associated Press: 1.3%Indoctrination0.3%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Brewster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Jack Brewster: 0.4%Associated Press: 2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.1%

1098 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers31%attributed speech753writer words
Selected voice

Lisa Brown

100%flagged-word coverage
14 attributed words4.1% of attributed speech58% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.6 ptsWriter: 1.6%Lisa Brown: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-0.4 ptsWriter: 0.4%Lisa Brown: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.