Gothamist76%

The Central Park Conservancy wants horse-drawn carriages banned. Its poll says NYC agrees. - Gothamist 6%

By Apolline Lamy22%

7/9/2026, 8:33:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 215 hits. Analysis detected 1,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 951 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (19,912 of 21,180 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 94.00% of the article peer group.

The Central Park Conservancy wants horse-drawn carriages banned. 
Its poll says NYC agrees. 
Published Jul 9, 2026 at 4:33 p.m. 
ET 
Modified Jul 9, 2026 at 8:14 p.m. 
ET 
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms . 
Spencer Platt / Getty Images 
We rely on your support to make local news available to all 
Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. 
Donate today 
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations 
A poll commissioned by the group that manages much of Central Park says most New Yorkers support ending horse-drawn carriages in the city  bolstering the not-for-profit's own position as the City Council considers a new push to end the practice. 
The poll was conducted just weeks after the death of 18-year-old Indian tourist Romanch Mahajan in the runaway carriage incident, and found most respondents had heard about his death. 
According to the Central Park Conservancy, which began calling to end the use of the carriages in the park last year, 68% of respondents support barring the practice. 
This Conservancy is releasing the poll just days ahead of a July 15 City Council health committee hearing about a bill prohibiting the carriages. 
The poll also found 20% of respondents were opposed to banning horse-drawn carriages, and 12% were undecided. 
But the union that represents carriage drivers, Transport Workers Union Local 100, said its own polling suggests the opposite of the Conservancy's. 
"We believe most New Yorkers, when provided with unbiased information, oppose a ban," Alexander Kemp, the administrative vice president of TWU Local 100, said in a statement to Gothamist. 
"They don't want to see immigrant carriage drivers, owners and their families economically wiped out. 
They don't want to see carriage horses forced into unpredictable and dangerous futures. 
They know that some would very likely end up at slaughter auctions or be euthanized.” 
Council Member Christoper Marte, who represents Lower Manhattan, is leading a renewed push for what’s now being called Romanch's Law, which would prohibit any new licenses for carriages from being issued after June 1, 2028. 
Last year, the Council shot down a similar prohibition, then named for Ryder, a horse that collapsed on the street and was later euthanized. 
Calls to ban horse-drawn carriages have persisted for years, over the objections of TWU 100, which has argued horses are both well cared-for and an integral part of the Central Park culture. 
Then-Mayor De Blasio vowed in 2014 to remove horse-drawn carriages from Central Park, without success. 
David Saltonstall, vice president for government relations at the Central Park Conservancy, said the nonprofit took a position against the carriages last year after a series of “scary incidents in the park." 
“Every couple of months, based on the data of the last year, a horse breaks free in Central Park, and if we wait another couple of months there's going to be another incident,” he said. 
Mayor Zohran Mamdani also favors removing the carriages from Central Park. 
Kemp wrote in an opinion piece published in the New York Daily News this week that a ban would threaten the welfare of 200 horses, and argued the city’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene has failed to adequately enforce existing rules meant to keep horses from straying. 
He advocated in the piece for another bill , sponsored by Councilmember James F. 
Gennaro of Queens, that would instead step up regulations on the industry  with stricter requirements for testing and training. 
He called a brief reference to a requirement for a workforce development program in Romanch’s Law’s a “feel-good farce”. 
According to the Conservancy, Zenith Research conduct the poll in late June and early July, collecting results via text-to-web interviews and an opt-in online panel from about 830 respondents. 
Saltonstall argued the poll was the first conducted without an agenda  comparing it to previous surveys by the union or an animal welfare organization. 
The new poll found 44% of respondents strongly agreed with the proposal to ban the carriages, and only 9% respondents strongly opposed it. 
Adam Carlson, a founding partner for Zenith Research, said that indicates  the passion on this is on the side of people who want it banned.” 
Horse-drawn carriages have been part of the city’s culture for about two centuries, according to the city Parks Department. 
In 1837, it would cost just 5 cents to ride from City Hall to Harlem on a carriage. 
But Saltonstall said "nostalgia cannot trump public safety.” 
“We have a public safety threat that needs to be mitigated," he said. 
This story has been updated with more information. 
Apolline Lamy is a reporting intern on the Day-of Desk. 
She is studying for her master's degree from the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at CUNY. 
Skeletal remains found in vacant East Harlem building, police say 
A homeless veteran had been staying in the building for at least two years, according to a 311 complaint this year. 
Police haven't said if the remains are his. 
Published Jul 9, 2026 at 6:23 p.m. 
ET 
NY attorney general sues chemical companies for PFAS pollution 
New York’s attorney general filed a lawsuit Thursday against major chemical companies for knowingly manufacturing and marketing consumer products with toxic forever chemicals. 
We mapped every UES cooling tower in the area affected by NYC’s latest Legionnaires’ outbreak 
Education tech purchases on pause as NYC schools wrestle with AI 
NYPD officer charged with rape of a minor after internal affairs investigation 
Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.3%Apolline Lamy: 1.4%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.9%Apolline Lamy: 2.7%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic9.9%This article: 5.3%Apolline Lamy: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic5.3%This article: 1.6%Apolline Lamy: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias1.6%This article: 4.3%Apolline Lamy: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias4.3%This article: 4.9%Apolline Lamy: 2.1%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.4%Apolline Lamy: 0.1%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%Apolline Lamy: 5.2%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias2.1%This article: 5.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias5.0%This article: 14.1%Apolline Lamy: 3.7%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias14.1%This article: 6.5%Apolline Lamy: 1.0%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Apolline Lamy: 2.5%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias3.5%This article: 1.6%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 1.7%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%Apolline Lamy: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.1%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem2.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 22.6%Apolline Lamy: 2.1%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority22.6%This article: 0.8%Apolline Lamy: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.8%This article: 5.3%Apolline Lamy: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope5.3%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.7%Apolline Lamy: 5.6%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization3.7%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.7%Apolline Lamy: 1.5%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon3.7%This article: 21.3%Apolline Lamy: 3.4%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion21.3%This article: 1.4%Apolline Lamy: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question1.4%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 1.3%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 2.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Appeal to Nature2.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 2.6%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.7%Apolline Lamy: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.7%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 2.6%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy2.6%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 4.3%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 1.1%Apolline Lamy: 2.7%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination1.1%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Apolline Lamy: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.5%

951 words analyzed.

Speakers

13speakers69%attributed speech299writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Central Park Conservancy • 8 words • 0.0% coverageGothamist • 7 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Park Conservancy • 8 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Park Conservancy • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageNew York Public Radio • 20 words • 100.0% coverageSpencer Platt • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageGothamist • 10 words • 100.0% coverageGothamist • 2 words • 100.0% coverageGothamist • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Park Conservancy • 28 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Park Conservancy • 24 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Park Conservancy • 17 words • 0.0% coverageTransport Workers Union Local 100 • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAlexander Kemp • 29 words • 0.0% coverageAlexander Kemp • 15 words • 0.0% coverageAlexander Kemp • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAlexander Kemp • 15 words • 0.0% coverageChristoper Marte • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageTransport Workers Union Local 100 • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Saltonstall • 32 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Saltonstall • 35 words • 0.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAlexander Kemp • 48 words • 0.0% coverageAlexander Kemp • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAlexander Kemp • 20 words • 0.0% coverageAlexander Kemp • 19 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Park Conservancy • 29 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Saltonstall • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageAdam Carlson • 26 words • 0.0% coveragecity Parks Department • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Saltonstall • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Saltonstall • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageApolline Lamy • 10 words • 0.0% coverageApolline Lamy • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageNew York’s attorney general • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words3.5% of attributed speech77% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -10.4 ptsWriter: 10.4%New York’s attorney general: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.