Gothamist77%

NY proposes $700M for Atlantic Yards, new developers say affordable housing ready by 2031 56%

By David Brand72%

6/29/2026, 9:44:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Anchoring Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 136 hits. Analysis detected 1,267 faulty-reasoning hits from 778 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.6% and a BS Rank of 56% (9,639 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the article peer group.

Developers behind the latest effort to build thousands of new apartments above and along Brooklyn’s Atlantic Yards train tracks say they plan to break ground by 2028  a quarter century after city and state officials first greenlit the long-stalled development. 
The project will cost an estimated $5 billion, with New York state chipping in roughly $700 million to build a pair of platforms over the Vanderbilt Yard train tracks between Atlantic Avenue and Pacific Street, state officials said. 
The Monday proposal marks the latest chapter for a project that has emerged as a symbol of broken promises and unrealistic housing proposals. 
The incomplete megadevelopment was first announced in 2003. 
In the ensuing years, developers built 3,200 units on the blocks surrounding the train yard and the centerpiece arena, Barclays Center, including on lots seized through eminent domain. 
But a procession of firms has so far failed to deliver nearly 900 affordable apartments promised as part of the development, despite a legally binding agreement to do so by May 2025 or face millions of dollars in monthly fines. 
The state’s economic development authority, Empire State Development, waived those penalties on the eve of the deadline, citing the risk of a lawsuit, as it lined up a new development team to take over the project. 
At a public meeting Monday, that new team, made up of the real estate firms Cirrus Workforce Housing and LCOR, unveiled a formal proposal for the site in a slideshow presentation. 
Their plan would feature about 5,600 new condos and apartments across six highrises, including a nearly 800-foot-tall skyscraper connected to an adjoining 570-foot tower at the corner of Flatbush Avenue and Pacific Street. 
At least 1,242 of the apartments, or roughly 21%, would be priced for low- and middle-income renters, according to the presentation given to members of a community group that monitors the project's progress. 
Cirrus CEO Joseph McDonnell told the group that his team could begin work on at least some of the new affordable housing units as early as 2028, which would mean tenants could move in three years after that. 
 That is people living in these buildings in 2031,” McDonnell said. 
“So fairly ambitious goals, but we actually stand in a place where we can do that given the work that has been done to date.” 
McDonnell said a previous developer, Greenland Holdings, had invested $1 billion to build a foundation for a future platform and obtained permits that could speed construction. 
He also acknowledged the years of broken promises and delays, but said the new proposal is “intellectually honest about the constraints of the site” and its funding needs. 
“With Atlantic Yards, it's something that's evolved and it's fairly controversial,” he said. 
“I think some people are actually borderline emotional about it, for good reason.” 
The project is expected to cost about $5 billion, with union pension funds financing the bulk of the construction through loans to the developer. 
McDonnell has previously said his team could complete the entire project by the late 2030s. 
Empire State Development spokesperson Emily Mijatovic said the state will likely chip in about $700 million, including $175 million earmarked for the project in the state’s latest budget. 
The development team had requested at least $300 million to help fund construction of a long-stalled platform above the active train yard. 
The delays have ignited outcry among many longtime residents and local leaders who helped craft affordable housing agreements for the project. 
Atlantic Yards skirted community oversight procedures in favor of a state-shepherded process typically called a General Project Plan, casting a dark cloud on similar projects decades later. 
But the new proposal also marks a fresh start for one of three large-scale development projects over rail yards that have been proposed in New York City, including an extension of the Hudson Yards project on Manhattan’s West Side and a plan pursued by Mayor Zohran Mamdani, with President Trump’s blessing, to deck over the sprawling Sunnyside Yards tracks in Western Queens. 
Daniel Kummer, board chair of the Atlantic Yards Community Development Corporation, the group that monitors project progress, said he was happy to finally have a new plan in place. 
“This is a day we’ve been waiting for for a long time,” Kummer said. 
“People may have issues with it, but I hope there’s a shared feeling in this room that we’re glad we’re on this next phase.” 
Clarification: The headline of this story was changed to indicate that New York Empire State Development, the state's economic authority, has not yet secured all $700 million in funding for Atlantic Yards. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.3%David Brand: 1.9%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias9.3%This article: 12.6%David Brand: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias12.6%This article: 6.7%David Brand: 2.9%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic6.7%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%David Brand: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias3.2%This article: 5.9%David Brand: 9.0%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 8.0%David Brand: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias8.0%This article: 4.4%David Brand: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect4.4%This article: 10.7%David Brand: 4.3%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias10.7%This article: 3.0%David Brand: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias3.0%This article: 14.3%David Brand: 7.7%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias14.3%This article: 3.6%David Brand: 3.4%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias3.6%This article: 6.3%David Brand: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error6.3%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%David Brand: 1.8%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 1.7%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.9%David Brand: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.9%David Brand: 3.3%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority1.9%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.1%David Brand: 3.3%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization5.1%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.1%David Brand: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon3.1%This article: 5.8%David Brand: 5.8%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion5.8%This article: 3.2%David Brand: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question3.2%This article: 6.8%David Brand: 2.5%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.8%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 1.4%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.0%David Brand: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground8.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 3.6%David Brand: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading3.6%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.9%David Brand: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote12.9%This article: 1.5%David Brand: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection1.5%This article: 17.5%David Brand: 4.1%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice17.5%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

778 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers37%attributed speech492writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageEmpire State Development • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageJoseph McDonnell • 38 words • 100.0% coverageJoseph McDonnell • 12 words • 100.0% coverageJoseph McDonnell • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJoseph McDonnell • 26 words • 0.0% coverageJoseph McDonnell • 28 words • 0.0% coverageJoseph McDonnell • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJoseph McDonnell • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Mijatovic • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 62 words • 100.0% coverageDaniel Kummer • 29 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Kummer • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Kummer • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Joseph McDonnell

92%flagged-word coverage
155 attributed words54% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-16.6 ptsWriter: 25.0%Joseph McDonnell: 8.4%8.4%Unattributed Quote+11.9 ptsWriter: 12.6%Joseph McDonnell: 24.5%24.5%Quote-first Misdirection+7.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Joseph McDonnell: 7.7%7.7%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.